Find the answer to your Linux question:

View Poll Results: Do you use font antialiasing?

Voters
11. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yep! MS Cleartype and I Love it. (colour LCD)

    5 45.45%
  • Yep! Generic subpixel smoothing and I Love it. (colour LCD)

    4 36.36%
  • Yep! Normal grayscale smoothing for my CRT.

    4 36.36%
  • Hell no! pfuah! makes my eyes water it does! YARR!

    1 9.09%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
There's something bugging me - I don't like antialiased fonts. Cry more, you'll say. Freak! you'll say. Let me explain - I feel that the obvious loss of sharpness of ...
  1. #1
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1

    A heathen's thoughts on antialiasing and font legibility

    There's something bugging me - I don't like antialiased fonts.
    Cry more, you'll say. Freak! you'll say.

    Let me explain - I feel that the obvious loss of sharpness of the characters when you enable even the best of antialiasing techniques (ClearType, or subpixel smoothing with Full hinting) fully negates the benefit of the nicer shapes, making the text much harder to read. It's definitely prettier, though.

    This only gets worse on coloured backgrounds.
    As of a couple of months ago, I've disabled all antialiasing of fonts in both XP and GNOME. I'm happy with the results, except if the font's hinting is lousy.
    I use the Microsoft web fonts package for their impeccable hinting (Arial, Verdana).

    Am I alone? Discuss!

  2. #2
    Linux Engineer Zelmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Riverton, UT, USA
    Posts
    1,001
    I agree that sharpness is more important than prettiness, but on my laptop the fonts looked so ragged without antialiasing that I had to use something. I fiddled around with all the settings I could find, and settled on full sub-pixel RGB hinting.
    Stand up and be counted as a Linux user!

  3. #3
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1
    I agree with that feeling, when i first changed my CRT for a spiffy new LCD i was horrified by the look of the non-antialiased text ("standard" AA doesn't do anything in windows for a LCD) ... looked so jaggy.
    I thought Cleartype was the best thing since butter toast, installed other apps to tweak the alpha a bit to make it clearer, was very happy with it.

    Then one day i had to work overtime a lot... came to a stage of tired where the damn fuzziness of the edges was giving me a headache. Turned it off.
    Ever since, I haven't been able to turn it back on, it just looks fiendishly difficult to read.
    For small fonts it doesn't work because they "fill up" and also become slightly transparent because of the subpixel rendering. For large fonts it doesn't matter.

    I hope this clarifies my position a tad

  4. #4
    Linux Guru techieMoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,496
    So... I'm confused. Why are you calling yourself a heathen?
    Registered Linux user #270181
    TechieMoe's Tech Rants

  5. #5
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1
    Because of my lack of the accepted monotheistic religion of font smoothing

  6. #6
    Linux Newbie burntfuse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Laurel, MD
    Posts
    158
    Personally, I like the 100dpi fonts (bitmapped, right?) the best, since they're much sharper than the vector fonts.
    I have sold my soul to the penguin

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •