Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 16 of 16
Originally Posted by Cabhan Once E17 hits stable, though, I am there. Me too. I figure in about five years, what do you think? Just kidding I can't wait for ...
  1. #11
    Linux Engineer psic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Posts
    1,205
    Quote Originally Posted by Cabhan
    Once E17 hits stable, though, I am there.
    Me too. I figure in about five years, what do you think?

    Just kidding I can't wait for it to come out, though.

    I used Xfce for a long time, but just recently switched back to KDE, it just has some really nice features I found lacking in xfce (a nice example is the Konqueror browser, which I use for file browsing, it's terminal emulator is just awsome).

  2. #12
    Linux Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    180
    Quote Originally Posted by zsugiart
    So I'm just curious to see, who uses other Windows Manager, and how do you use it? What file manager you use? What other apps and gadget you use in your daily life? Or is everyone pretty much switched to KDE/GNOME/XGL+compiz/beryl ???

    Windows managers and desktop environments are not the same. Gnome uses the metacity windows manager, you can just change it to something like fluxbox.

    A desktop environment is windows manager, file roller, applications... it's everything. A windows manager is only one part of that, albeit an important part. So I don't think that it's right to compare say gnome to openbox.

    If somebody only uses a windows manager that's just to say that they have decided not to use a complete desktop environment. Comparing an incomplete desktop environment to a full one is like apples and oranges.

    I see something like a lightweight windows manager has the first step in creating a customized desktop environment. Pick the file roller that you want, the icon themes that you want, your favorite apps...

  3. #13
    Trusted Penguin Cabhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Seattle, WA, USA
    Posts
    3,228
    One thing I've found with the window managers is that, aside from being very lightweight and minimalist, you have a LOT more control. Because they don't include their own apps, you're able to use programs designed for the purpose rather than a side component.

    I hit upon a good example last night. I was helping my friend set up his laptop (recently got SuSE on it), and the Play, Next, Previous, etc. keys were not working. This is because he uses Rhythmbox, and even though we mapped the keys in Gnome to "Play", "Next Song", etc., they would not affect Rhythmbox.

    Because I happen to know of other programs that do this, I was able to install a different program (LinEAK) that gives you more control (you give it specific commands rather than general ideas). I prefer this approach much more than the "Make our own app for everything and tie them together".


    As to the other questions: I use Rox as my file manager (I highly, highly recommend it) and good ol' xterm for my terminal.

    Me too. I figure in about five years, what do you think?
    Hah, I know. Better be the best window manager ever created.
    DISTRO=Arch
    Registered Linux User #388732

  4. #14
    Linux Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    180
    That is very cool.

  5. #15
    Linux User ImNeat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    N. America
    Posts
    392
    Fluxbox for laptop and Gnome for desktop.
    10" Sony Vaio SRX99P 850MHz P3-M 256MB RAM 20GB HD : ArchLinux
    14" Dell Inspiron 1420N 2GHz Core2Duo 2GB RAM 160GB HD : Xubuntu

  6. #16
    Linux Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    148
    Fluxbox. It just pwns.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •