Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Every saturday I go to the Suse mirror for an update of my Suse 10 os. Today after the update my mozilla browser morphed into the SeaMonkey browser. Does anyone ...
  1. #1
    Linux Enthusiast cousinlucky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    575

    Mozilla to SeaMonkey

    Every saturday I go to the Suse mirror for an update of my Suse 10 os. Today after the update my mozilla browser morphed into the SeaMonkey browser. Does anyone know why this change was instituted?

  2. #2
    Linux Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    The Hot Humid South
    Posts
    602
    That's just what it's called now! The Mozilla Suite no longer exists, it was renamed to SeaMonkey. Read:
    http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
    "Today you are freer than ever to do what you want, provided you can pay for it!" --Bad Religion

  3. #3
    Linux Newbie easuter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    194
    The Mozilla developers needed a good destiction between simple Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla (wich is the suite). So it was decided that the Mozilla internet suite would be renamed to Seamonkey.
    Don't ask me why the hell the chose that name. Wikipedia says its a species of brine shrimp....
    Seamonkey is one more app that has joined my "i-have-no-idea-why-they-gave-it-that-name" list
    All Empires rise and fall. The Microsoft Empire has already risen, only one way to go now...

  4. #4
    Linux Guru bryansmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    /Ontario/Canada
    Posts
    2,621
    Quote Originally Posted by easuter
    The Mozilla developers needed a good destiction between simple Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla (wich is the suite).
    Not quite. The Mozilla Foundation decided to focus on Firefox and Thunderbird and thus were going to cease development on the old Mozilla suite. With that said, some developers didn't want this to happen so they continued its development under a new name. Read the history paragraph here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SeaMonkey

    Bryan

    *EDIT* Upon closer inspection, it may appear as if you are on to something. There was talk about continuing the old name but they didn't because the Mozilla Foundation wanted to distance the project from theirs. (same link as above, under Naming).
    Last edited by bryansmith; 01-13-2007 at 09:03 PM.
    Looking for a distro? Look here.
    "There can be no doubt that all our knowledge begins with experience." - Immanuel Kant (Critique of Pure Reason)
    Queen's University - Arts and Science 2008 (Sociology)
    Registered Linux User #386147.

  5. #5
    Just Joined! Farmer Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Peyton Colorado
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by easuter
    The Mozilla developers needed a good destiction between simple Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla (wich is the suite). So it was decided that the Mozilla internet suite would be renamed to Seamonkey.
    Don't ask me why the hell the chose that name. Wikipedia says its a species of brine shrimp....
    Seamonkey is one more app that has joined my "i-have-no-idea-why-they-gave-it-that-name" list
    I've noticed in the Open Source world, they're less formal and more creative about naming things. I visited DistroWatch earlier and was amused to see Lunar-Linux 1.6.1-rc2 is code named 'Moose Drool'.

  6. #6
    Linux Enthusiast cousinlucky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    575
    Unhappily I just found out that I can not reply to Email using SeaMonkey the way I did when it was Mozilla. I have the same problem with my Yahoo account if i am using the Konqueror browser. Ah the aggravation just continues.

  7. #7
    Linux Newbie hughitt1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Baltimore, MD USA
    Posts
    167
    I installed seamonkey a while back because it had a cool name. It's done a good job for most part handling mail, and has a 'netscape' feel for browsing the web, but there is nothing that particularly stands out imo- firefox and thunderbird would do just as well.

  8. #8
    Linux Newbie easuter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    194
    but there is nothing that particularly stands out imo- firefox and thunderbird would do just as well.
    Seamonkey loads only one instance of the Gecko engine for all the open windows (browser/email client).
    Firefox/Thunderbird loads a new instance for every new window, so it is a bit heavier on resources.
    All Empires rise and fall. The Microsoft Empire has already risen, only one way to go now...

  9. #9
    Linux Newbie hughitt1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Baltimore, MD USA
    Posts
    167
    Seamonkey loads only one instance of the Gecko engine for all the open windows (browser/email client).
    Firefox/Thunderbird loads a new instance for every new window, so it is a bit heavier on resources.
    that is something nice about seamonkey

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •