Find the answer to your Linux question:

View Poll Results: Dual Boot or Virtual Computer?

Voters
12. You may not vote on this poll
  • Dual Boot

    8 66.67%
  • Virtual Computer

    4 33.33%
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Dual Boot or Virtual Computer, which do you prefer and why?...
  1. #1
    Linux Newbie chadders's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Earth.
    Posts
    102

    Dual Boot or Virtual Computer?

    Dual Boot or Virtual Computer, which do you prefer and why?
    That's my two pence worth.

    Chadders.

    Use my themes... click here.

    New to Linux Forums, or Linux in general? Start here.
    Get Debian (Etch) here.
    Registered Linux user #442544.

  2. #2
    Linux User tech_man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    385
    Dual Boot. Virtualization doesn't support 3d acceleration (yet).
    'Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt.'
    --Abraham Lincoln

  3. #3
    Linux User Dark_Stang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Around St. Louis
    Posts
    284
    Dual boot. I don't dual boot anymore but that's definately the way to go in my opinion.
    Two levels higher than a newb.
    (I can search google)

  4. #4
    Linux Guru techieMoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,496
    I did not vote because your question isn't specific enough. Neither dual boot nor virtualization are always the correct answer for everyone. If I'm going to be doing testing and I'm not concerned with 3D performance, a virtual machine is convenient and useful.

    If I want to play 3D games in another OS, then a dual-boot solution is best. There are any number of reasons why someone would want one over the other. It just depends on what you want to accomplish.
    Registered Linux user #270181
    TechieMoe's Tech Rants

  5. #5
    Linux Guru sdousley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,789
    I agree with Techie Moe. It depends entirely on the situation, and what you will use the secondary OS for. I have (recently) installed a lot of linux distributions in virtual machines, such that i can learn them. Also, if someone comes onto IRC and says "How do i do x in y distro" I can more than likely fire up that distro (or derivitive of) and work on pretty much the same system as the other person. This is where virtualisation would be useful.

    On the other hand, if what you use the second VM for is going to be quite resource intensive, because a VM means you are effectively running 2 systems from one, it would be better to dual-boot.
    "I am not an alcoholic, alcoholics go to meetings"
    Registered Linux user = #372327

  6. #6
    Linux Newbie stubbe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    143
    certainly dual boot. I get both OS at 100% performance. Using VM I suppose recommended only for those who are learning and trying to avoid total system damage.

  7. #7
    Linux Enthusiast apoorv_khurasia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Laurasia
    Posts
    624
    There was no option for "both" so I went for dual boot because I use more systems on it. I run new OS on virtual PC before trying it out on my hardware. Also as somebody said virtualization is not that good with hardware if you want to test the OS run it on the bare machine.
    "There is no sixth rule"
    --Rob Pike
    Registered Linux User: 400426 home page

  8. #8
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    6
    Dual boot.

  9. #9
    Just Joined! rockinup1231's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    16
    I didn't vote, either. I only use Linux because my compy only has a 10gb hard drive, and multiple partitions for 2 OS's just isn't an option. I am going to buy a new one soon. Maybe then I will.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •