| |  | |
03-19-2007
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Linux User
Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Hartlepool, England
Posts: 384
| I'd like distros to be released with better wireless support. You can do alot or install new things without an internet, and wireless support is getting better.
__________________
Graham - You'd better Use Linux!
I'm registerd Linux user #397030. What about you? |
| |
03-19-2007
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Texas
Posts: 8,749
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Oxygen I'd like distros to be released with better wireless support. | You realize that most of this is completely out of the hands of distro maintainers, correct? |
| |
03-19-2007
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Linux Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 556
| most of the lack of wireless support has to do with chip sets that manufacturers don't release the information about so that drivers can be written or at least they don't write Linux drivers for them as well. the best thing to do is to thoroughly research any wireless card you plan to buy and make sure its a chip set that works with Linux drivers. I spent a week looking through cards and found a D-Link card with atheros chip set that would work and bought it. plus i posted a review about it on new egg stating that it works with Linux. part of my research has come up with new egg reviews that state that Linux users had luck getting it to work.
__________________ Blog Registered Linux user 396557 |
| |
03-20-2007
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Linux Newbie
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 143
| a base installation that's very minimal and everything working right out of the box that would work as a plain server. Better current hardware supports. Module based. Like I want a KDE, so I just download 1 file, without worrying dependencies, install it and tadaa I have a fully working plain KDE (without any softwares included, just the GUIs). |
| |
03-20-2007
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Linux User
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Panama City
Posts: 307
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Vergil83 I have said it before and will say it again. No new distro, but innovative new interfaces. | I agree. The environment that i've found closest to my taste is fvwm-crystal but I just don't use it because of it's complete lack of custumization. recipe's are the most retarted idea i've ever heard of. |
| |
03-20-2007
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: The green fields of Brabant, Netherlands
Posts: 589
| If you want to improve distributions, select your favorite one and join their test-team(s). Help to improve it 
__________________ "Yoda of Borg are we: Futile resistance is. Assimilate you, we will." Distributions in use: CentOS 4.7 + 5.2 Registered Linux user #327830 100% on Linux since september 7, 2003 - now I am free! |
| |
03-21-2007
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Trusted Penguin
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Cowtown, Texas
Posts: 2,469
| I'd like to see a distro (any distro) put a severe crimp in the M$ Desktop market.
Maybe it'll be Mozilla. http://www.nordichardware.com/news,5921.html
Nah, just wishful thinking.
__________________
All new Users please read: FAQ |
| |
03-21-2007
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Linux Guru
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,409
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by MikeTbob | That is the last thing I want. WIndows has already had enough security issues with IE being so key to the OS. The last thing we need is to build a entire desktop of gecko and xul. One flaw takes everything down. |
| |
03-21-2007
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Linux User
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Third Stone From The Sun
Posts: 287
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by BlahBlah_X I was thinking of making a light version of MEPIS with beryl not on default and lighter software. And XFCE 4.4
I think that would be helpful because many people are newbies want to try MEPIS on an old computer and the result is less than stellar.
What do you think? | Have two AMD 500 K6 II running on Mepis, one PIII 1 gighz running on Mepis, one AMD 650 mhz running on mepis, one AMD 1.3 mhz running Mepis, so what is your point? And none of these machines have video cards supported by Beryl, so how can it be on by defalut? 
__________________
Research, research, research before you walk the plank.
Registered Linux User #398829
|
| |
03-21-2007
|
#20 (permalink)
| | Linux User
Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Third Stone From The Sun
Posts: 287
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Redman If you want to improve distributions, select your favorite one and join their test-team(s). Help to improve it  | Bang, hit the nail on the head, that is why Vista is still playing catch up to us. 
__________________
Research, research, research before you walk the plank.
Registered Linux User #398829
|
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | Job Search | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 02:07 PM. |
| |