Welcome to Linux Forums!

With a comprehensive Linux Forum, information on various types of Linux software and many Linux Reviews articles, we have all the knowledge you need a click away, or accessible via our knowledgeable members.

Linux Forum ArticlesLinux ForumsLinux Forum DownloadsLinux HostsFree MagazinesJobs
Home|Register|FAQ|Member List|Calendar|Unanswered Posts|Forum Rules|Today's Posts|Advanced Search|
SEARCH FOR IN
Go Back   Linux Forums > The Community > The Coffee Lounge
Reload this Page Favorite Distro for Older/Weaker Hardware
Linux Forums
Linux Forums
Welcome To The Linux Forums!
Welcome to Linux Forums. We pride ourselves in being one of the largest Linux communities on the web, we encourage you to REGISTER on our forums and participate in the community. There are over 150,000 members ready to answer your questions. JOINING US today will allow you to make new posts, get support, send messages to other members and submit downloads to our downloads directory and many other great features!

The Coffee Lounge General chat about anything that goes, a good place to introduce yourself and say hi, tell a Joke, or just relax.

Site Navigation
Articles
Linux Forums
Linux Downloads
Linux Hosting
Free Magazines
Job Board
Linux Forum Topics
Linux Forums
Your Distro
Linux Resources
GNU Linux Zone
The Community
View Poll Results: What is your favorite Linux distribution for older/weaker hardware?
Arch 3 3.16%
Damn Small Linux (DSL) 31 32.63%
Debian 19 20.00%
Puppy 7 7.37%
Slackware 10 10.53%
Vector 4 4.21%
Zenwalk 4 4.21%
Other (please list below) 17 17.89%
Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2007   #31 (permalink)
Linux Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Hot Humid South
Posts: 602
I think I might have to change my vote (even though it's not going to change in the poll). I voted for Slackware, but thinking of putting a computer with spare parts I have laying around I realized that Slack really can't be used. The computer specs are not bad, except for the HD: 500MHz K6-2, 64MB RAM and a 250MB HD (from a Compaq Contura laptop). The processor and RAM can handle almost any distro, but the HD space really limits things. Slack is really not a good option for this hardware since even if I install just the packages from "a/" I'll end up filling the HD since the packages include development headers. For this case, I'm thinking I'll have to go with Debian which can install a bare system in very little drive space.

Anyway, that's just somethng I ran into recently and thought I'd mention it.
__________________
"Today you are freer than ever to do what you want, provided you can pay for it!" --Bad Religion
bidi is offline  
Old 08-19-2007   #32 (permalink)
Just Joined!
 
geminiguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 0
Saxen OS is great for older systems..... P133 128Mb ram runs very nice SaxenOS - New Power for old hardware

Last edited by ozar; 08-21-2007 at 07:15 PM. Reason: corrected URL
geminiguy is offline  
Old 08-20-2007   #33 (permalink)
Linux User
 
cayalee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: england
Posts: 379
Send a message via MSN to cayalee Send a message via Skype™ to cayalee
just to clarify, the link above should be: SaxenOS - New Power for old hardware
__________________
You know, aliens are going to come to earth in 50 years and kill the hell out of us for DDoSing their networks with this SETI crap
registered linux user #388463
cayalee is offline  
Old 08-21-2007   #34 (permalink)
Just Joined!
 
geminiguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by cayalee View Post
just to clarify, the link above should be: SaxenOS - New Power for old hardware
Man.... why are the M and the N so close together.... Thanks for fixing that... I guess that's what that "preview post" button is for
geminiguy is offline  
Old 09-01-2007   #35 (permalink)
Linux Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 785
LFS is the way to go. I built an optimized Linux From Scratch on my old 486 (25mhz, 20mb ram, 20mb, 200mb, and 420mb hard drives) and it ran probably 2x as fast as DSL, Deli, or any other distro I tried. So what if it took 2 months of non stop compiling to get it done (that's no joke). So what if I had to kill every possible process and all but one console to have enough memory to build glibc. It was by far the fastest that box has ever ran.
valan is offline  
Old 09-09-2007   #36 (permalink)
Just Joined!
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 97
older hardware

My vote goes to dsl because it is small @ 50meg, is a live cd which allowes testing before install, has a boot floppy for boxs that do not boot from cd, will accept a dial up connection and detect some internal modems...some..and installed to my dx2-66mhz with 32 meg ram with small swap on a 500 meg drive and ran x and allowed easy addition of low ram programs..the thumb install worked on win 98 and xp with the inconvienience of running xsetup to allow for different config.
slackware has been around for ever and older version will function well on older hardware. but install is required so a greater learning curve for new users..slax is interesting...feather is similar to dsl as a knoppix mini but I did not find it as versatile, deli was harder for me as was mulinux and basic linux although a great little floppy set was smaller than I desired. the others I used were bigger and needed more of something or other. So..dsl for me was easyist and worked on the least and best I had interest in useing it on
the disadvantage at the moment is some are not able to use the dsl forum and if this is your case you will have to search here or alternative forums for assistance.
bucky is offline  
Old 10-15-2007   #37 (permalink)
Just Joined!
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The Sovereign State of My Brown Slip-On Shoes
Posts: 6
i've tried em all.

DSL! how can ya not vote for it.

everything on it is geared for smallness and fastness. it's so light and nimble it will make you wonder just what your machine was upto when it had windows on it.

good choices tho, any of those would likely do the business on an old machine.


i recently tried resulinux just to see if it lived upto the hype of an extremely fast boot, like i had done many months prior with vector. it does! shame i cant seem to get it to speak english to me tho.


i often go around reccomending slax as well, it has such a cutesie easy plug n play style to it. great for us n00bs too. easier to expand and customise than dsl. i bet you could get dsl working on a p90 and have it run faster n more beautifully than win 95 ever did.
Digit is offline  
Old 11-23-2007   #38 (permalink)
Just Joined!
 
NickWelder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 44
I voted for DSL. It is just perfect for older machines. Hell, it ran faster EMULATED on my computer than XP does natively! I am surprised as hell that it is only 50mb. Once you have it booted up it feels just like any large distribution. I love it! I wouldn't use it full time on a fast computer, that is what PCLinuxOS is for, but it makes a great emergency USB Flash drive distribution and if I get an old PC for a server I guarantee that DSL will be used for it.
NickWelder is offline  
Old 12-26-2007   #39 (permalink)
Just Joined!
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5
im thinking of a number between dsmalllinux and slacker
Skycastle is offline  
Closed Thread



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Job Search
keyword location
Post a Job »
job title, keywords or company
city, state or zip jobs by job search

Free Magazines
Free eBook:"Vulnerability Management for Dummies"
Get all the Facts and See How to Implement a Successful Vulnerability Management Program.
subscribe
Google vs The World: The Battle of the Message Security Vendors
With such a powerful name behind it, Google Message Security stands out in a sea of products that do exactly the same thing - or so they say. So when it comes right down to it, how does the Google selection stack up against the rest of messaging security's big guns?
subscribe
The Enterprise Newsweekly
eWeek is the essential technology information source for builders of e-business.
subscribe
Oracle Magazine
Oracle Magazine contains technology strategy articles, sample code, tips, Oracle and partner news, how to articles for developers and DBAs, and more. Oracle (NASDAQ: ORCL) is the world's largest enterprise software company.
subscribe
Total Telecom
Total Telecom is "The Economist of the communications industry".
subscribe
More free magazines »



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:57 PM.




© 2000 - 2008 - All Rights Reserved - Property of  MAS Media

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0