Find the answer to your Linux question:

View Poll Results: What is your favorite Linux distribution for older/weaker hardware?

Voters
95. You may not vote on this poll
  • Arch

    3 3.16%
  • Damn Small Linux (DSL)

    31 32.63%
  • Debian

    19 20.00%
  • Puppy

    7 7.37%
  • Slackware

    10 10.53%
  • Vector

    4 4.21%
  • Zenwalk

    4 4.21%
  • Other (please list below)

    17 17.89%
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 39
This poll/thread is meant to help those users that are having difficulty deciding which distribution(s) they should use to work with their older/weaker computer. Please use it to post information ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
  1. #1
    oz
    oz is offline
    forum.guy
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    arch linux
    Posts
    18,733

    Favorite Distro for Older/Weaker Hardware


    This poll/thread is meant to help those users that are having difficulty deciding which distribution(s) they should use to work with their older/weaker computer. Please use it to post information about your favorite distro for older/weaker hardware, but don't post comments saying that any particular distro is the best, because the best truly is very subjective.

    Note that this thread will be locked and/or deleted at the end of the year and a new thread started.
    oz

  2. #2
    Super Moderator devils casper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Chandigarh, India
    Posts
    24,729
    Damn Small Linux.
    it has two versions. DSL having kernel version 2.4 and DSL-N having kernel version 2.6.
    one should try DSL first, if it doesn't work, DSL-N will definitely work,
    Last edited by devils casper; 04-19-2007 at 07:09 PM. Reason: typo
    It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit.
    New Users: Read This First

  3. #3
    Linux User tech_man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    385
    It is close between Vector and Slack, but I went with Slack because it was the first after all.
    'Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt.'
    --Abraham Lincoln

  4. #4
    Linux Newbie harner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    PA, USA
    Posts
    209
    I would say Arch or Slack, but Arch takes the ball. I don't have much personal experience with it like I do with Slack, however I learned it in college. Great for beginners and easy to work with. I completely recommend this distro to anyone interested in Linux.
    I praise Webmin and PuTTy!
    Registered Linux User: 439431

  5. #5
    Linux Newbie tommytabib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    127
    I voted DSL, although i have not actually tried it before but i have heard many a good review and distrowatch shows that its really getting up there with the major distros.
    It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets.

    - Voltaire

  6. #6
    oz
    oz is offline
    forum.guy
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    arch linux
    Posts
    18,733

    voted Slackware...

    I voted Slackware, but Zenwalk and DSL are right up there with it.
    oz

  7. #7
    Linux Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    The Hot Humid South
    Posts
    602
    I went with Slackware here! I used the process of elimination. Zenwalk, DSL and Puppy really aren't FULL distros and sometimes I just have to have GCC and headers (my test comptures need to be connected to the internet through a wireless card, which has a free driver but needs to be compiled). Vector really isn't a lightweight distro but a "more polished" Slackware. Debian is nice, I might favorite over all distro, but doesn't seem to do so well with a slow processor. And I've never tried Arch, but from what I gather it's a source distro, which doesn't mate well with older hardware.

    There's also another distro out there called DeLi Linux which is specially geared toward 486-to-PI/II processors which is really nice. I think if it were on the list I would have a hard time choosing between it and Slackware.
    "Today you are freer than ever to do what you want, provided you can pay for it!" --Bad Religion

  8. #8
    Linux Engineer valemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Volos
    Posts
    934
    That's vector for me, though it requires more power than DSL. If you got >400MHz and >128 Mb you are ok with Vector (running xfce)
    Linux is like a Teepee, No Windows, No Gates, Only Apache Inside!
    Arch Linux
    Linux user #442041

  9. #9
    Linux Newbie daacosta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Medellín, Colombia
    Posts
    213
    Damn Small Linux has been good to me....
    -D-

    Registered User # 402675

  10. #10
    Linux User Giles's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Gloucestershire and Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    283
    I do love DSL, and I use slack for some things too. I voted "other", tho, because in my ordinary day-to-day usage I always use Mandriva, and have been running it very successful on pretty old hardware all of my Linux life. Probably the oldest box I've put it on was a 266Mhz proc, 192Mb ram old beast which is now my server, so this might not be a valid answer for anyone who's planning to use even older hardware.

    Just always use blackbox
    Giles
    "Our greatest fear is not that we are powerless. Our greatest fear is Microsoft"
    Registered linux user #391027

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •