Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 28 of 28
Originally Posted by budman7 Have you tried dwm? I am emerging this as I type. I have never heard of the dynamic window manager. I love to try new stuff ...
  1. #21
    oz
    oz is offline
    forum.guy
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    arch linux
    Posts
    17,782


    Quote Originally Posted by budman7 View Post
    Have you tried dwm?
    I am emerging this as I type.
    I have never heard of the dynamic window manager.
    I love to try new stuff out.
    No, I haven't but will check it out. However, I have used wmii, from the same website. Thanks for the recommendation.

    I've kind of settled into Gnome over the last 3 or 4 days and while not perfect by any means, I think I'll use it for awhile. This is the longest I've ever stuck with Gnome and it's really starting to grow on me. It feels a bit lighterweight than KDE, but once the new KDE 4 comes out, it'll certainly need a close look.
    oz

    new users: read this first
    no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!

  2. #22
    Linux Guru budman7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Knee deep in Grand Rapids, Michigan
    Posts
    3,242
    Dwm is definitely for the elitist.
    The only way to edit it is to edit the source code, and you need a working knowledge of C, according to the website, which I am clueless about.
    How to know if you are a geek.
    when you respond to "get a life!" with "what's the URL?"
    - Birger

    New users read The FAQ

  3. #23
    Super Moderator MikeTbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,945
    Quote Originally Posted by budman7 View Post
    Dwm is definitely for the elitist.
    The only way to edit it is to edit the source code, and you need a working knowledge of C, according to the website, which I am clueless about.
    YIKES!!
    WTF does DWM stand for, Dangerous Window Mananger??
    I do not respond to private messages asking for Linux help, Please keep it on the forums only.
    All new users please read this. and the Forum FAQS.

  4. #24
    Linux Newbie dalinux_n00bie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    226
    What about Beryl!
    I love beryl as a windows manager
    "Do or do not...there is no try" -Yoda
    History is a set of lies agreed upon by the winners.
    Linux is user friendly, not idiot friendly.
    Linux User 437442

  5. #25
    oz
    oz is offline
    forum.guy
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    arch linux
    Posts
    17,782
    Quote Originally Posted by dalinux_n00bie View Post
    What about Beryl!
    I love beryl as a windows manager
    I'll admit that I've never actually installed Beryl, but judging from all the various demos and screenshots that I've seen, it's nothing I'd care for at all. I'm not big on eyecandy, and so far that's about the only use I've seen for it. Other than that, it seems to be just one more thing to slow the system down.

    Of course, that's just my own opinion.
    oz

    new users: read this first
    no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!

  6. #26
    Linux Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    6,110
    I can see why you would think of Beryl like that, that was my first impression too. To be honest though I don't use any of the eyecandy like burning menus or gratuitous effects like water trails. However the main benefit I find with any composite manager is that the GPU is drawing the desktop so it takes the weight off of the CPU. No more 25% spikes when I shake a window around and no more windows not repainting when they are busy.

    Even if you were to try it with all of the effects turned off except maybe switcher,cube,scale and wobbly (yes wobbly ) the desktop feels a lot more responsive.

  7. #27
    Linux Newbie dalinux_n00bie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    226
    Quote Originally Posted by bigtomrodney View Post
    Even if you were to try it with all of the effects turned off except maybe switcher,cube,scale and wobbly (yes wobbly ) the desktop feels a lot more responsive.
    Thats why I like it, the wobbly windows. It makes the desktop feel more....I don't know.... alive
    "Do or do not...there is no try" -Yoda
    History is a set of lies agreed upon by the winners.
    Linux is user friendly, not idiot friendly.
    Linux User 437442

  8. #28
    oz
    oz is offline
    forum.guy
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    arch linux
    Posts
    17,782
    Quote Originally Posted by bigtomrodney View Post
    I can see why you would think of Beryl like that, that was my first impression too. To be honest though I don't use any of the eyecandy like burning menus or gratuitous effects like water trails. However the main benefit I find with any composite manager is that the GPU is drawing the desktop so it takes the weight off of the CPU. No more 25% spikes when I shake a window around and no more windows not repainting when they are busy.

    Even if you were to try it with all of the effects turned off except maybe switcher,cube,scale and wobbly (yes wobbly ) the desktop feels a lot more responsive.
    Howdy, bigtomrodney - just wanted to respond and let you know that I went ahead and installed Beryl to see what it was all about, but I didn't care for any part of it. I played with the various settings, but the whole thing was simply too annoying and clumsy feeling for my tastes, so I removed it.

    Glad it suites your tastes, though.
    oz

    new users: read this first
    no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •