Results 1 to 10 of 12
I ask the national members of ISO to vote "NO" to the ballot on the Microsoft Office OpenXML (OOXML) specification to become an ISO standard for the following reasons:
There ...
- 06-21-2007 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Posts
- 0
Say NO to the Microsoft Office format as an ISO standard
I ask the national members of ISO to vote "NO" to the ballot on the Microsoft Office OpenXML (OOXML) specification to become an ISO standard for the following reasons:
There is already a standard ISO26300 named Open Document Format (ODF): a dual standard adds cost to industry, government and citizens;
There is no provable implementation of the OOXML specification: Microsoft Office 2007 produces a special version of OOXML, not a file format which complies with the OOXML specification;
There is missing information from the specification document, for example how to do a autoSpaceLikeWord95 or useWord97LineBreakRules;
More the 10% of the examples mentioned in the standard do not validate XML conformity;
There is no garantee that anybody can write a software that fully implements the OOXML specification without being liable to patent damages or patent license fees;
This standard conflicts with other ISO standards, such as ISO 8601 (Representation of dates and times), ISO 639 (Codes for the Representation of Names and Languages) or ISO/IEC 10118-3 (cryptographic hash);
There is a bug in the spreadsheet file format which forbids to enter any date before the year 1900: such bugs affects the OOXML specification as well as software versions such as Microsoft Excel 2000, XP, 2003 or 2007.
This standard has not been created by bringing together the experience and expertise of all interested parties (such as the producers, sellers, buyers, users and regulators), but by Microsoft alone.
noooxml: Say NO to the Microsoft Office format as an ISO standard
- 06-21-2007 #2Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- a box
- Posts
- 15
Seconded .
- 06-21-2007 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- So.CA - Woodland Hills
- Posts
- 34
So do you need a flash plugin to sign the petition?
- 06-23-2007 #4
Sir! Petition signed, sir!
I took liberty to spreading the word, sir!
It was a long read, but worth it.
- 06-27-2007 #5
Signed. Need more people though.
- 08-31-2007 #6
This thread is in definit need of a bump!
If you have not signed this yet: now is your _last_ chance since next week the voting will take place.
Don't let microsoft rule your world!Now what? You have Linux installed and running. The GUI is working fine, but you are getting tired of changing your desktop themes. You keep seeing this "terminal" thing. Don't worry, they'll show you what to do @
<~ http://www.linuxcommand.org/ ~>
- 09-01-2007 #7
At the eleventh hour:
Open Source Weblog: When the standards are this low, no one wins
Microsoft and Its Rivals Take 'Office' Politics Global - WSJ.com
It shames me to think this circus is caused by grownup adult men. Well, nothing to do but hold our breath... Decision will be public on Monday.Can't tell an OS by it's GUI
- 09-02-2007 #8
And the war continues:
Matusow's Blog : Open XML - The Vote in Sweden
(blog by a microsoft employee)
Google's Position on OOXML as a Proposed ISO StandardNow what? You have Linux installed and running. The GUI is working fine, but you are getting tired of changing your desktop themes. You keep seeing this "terminal" thing. Don't worry, they'll show you what to do @
<~ http://www.linuxcommand.org/ ~>
- 09-04-2007 #9forum.guy
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- arch linux
- Posts
- 18,082
Okay, it looks like they said "no":
PC World - ISO Rejects Microsoft's OOXML as Standardoz
→ new members/users: read this first | new member faq
→ no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
→ please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.
- 09-08-2007 #10
Thank God for that! Is there no limit to Microsoft's insolence?
"I'm just a little old lady; don't try to dazzle me with jargon!"


Reply With Quote
