Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 29 of 29
Originally Posted by dfxdeimos You mean Intel hardware? nothing special inside a Mac anymore. No I'm talking about peripherals. I know that's confusing because then I switch immediately to talking ...
  1. #21
    Linux Newbie
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    180
    Quote Originally Posted by dfxdeimos View Post
    You mean Intel hardware? nothing special inside a Mac anymore.
    No I'm talking about peripherals. I know that's confusing because then I switch immediately to talking about architectures in the next sentence. So I was trying to say this--

    (a) You can't use all Mac peripherals on a pc. I know they're moving away from that it, but hey it was worth mentioning.

    (b) How many architectures does Windows support? Contrast that with Debian. Maybe you don't realize that not all computing is done on Intel x86, x86_64.

    I think it is fair. You don't need to have a monopoly to pressure hardware manufacturers, just a large enough base so that the manufacturer says, "Oh, maybe it would be profitable for us to supply docs & drivers."
    That's a fictional case-- non-MS OSs are only 10% of the market. In a fair market where each OS has no more than like 30% of the user base, then yeah you'd be right. As it stands there is only one operating system that can do that, the one with the monopoly. The reality is that it's not profitable to supply drivers for other OSs, and full disclosure of proper documentation and specs for linux coders to write their own drivers is too compromising, it can show too many of their tricks to the competitors. MS had an advantage when it started and then it used unethical and illegal practices to achieve vendor lock in, and you think that somehow that is the fault of linux?

  2. #22
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA, USA
    Posts
    28
    I do not think it is the fault of Linux.

    My only point is that it is too bad that there isn't more of a single force in the Linux world that can put pressure on the hardware makers to provide docs to at least allow the community to build drivers.

  3. #23
    Linux Engineer Freston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,047
    Quote Originally Posted by Mahlerfan
    Windows is still where Slackware is.
    You're a Slackware user yourself, so I know where you're coming from. But Slack deserves a little more credit, so allow me to nuance this statement.

    Slackware is so by choice, it's a trade off. Ease is traded in for power and flexibility. And if you don't feel like compiling, rpm instead. Windows is so by default, without choice. There is one way of doing it. And only hints towards ease, IMHO... although they are getting better

    And Slackpacks are easier to install than anything really.




    That said, it comes down to taste, again...
    Can't tell an OS by it's GUI

  4. #24
    oz
    oz is online now
    forum.guy
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    arch linux
    Posts
    18,084
    I gave up on both Windows and Linux a long time ago, but I still use Windows every day at work (forced), and then Linux every day at home (want to). Giving up on them doesn't stop me from using either of them.
    oz

    new members/users: read this first | new member faq
    no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
    please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.

  5. #25
    Linux Engineer d38dm8nw81k1ng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    793
    Quote Originally Posted by dfxdeimos View Post
    You mean Intel hardware? nothing special inside a Mac anymore.



    I think it is fair. You don't need to have a monopoly to pressure hardware manufacturers, just a large enough base so that the manufacturer says, "Oh, maybe it would be profitable for us to supply docs & drivers."

    I am on my way into school so that is all your getting out of me this morning!

    Regards
    this is already happening. research, my friend.
    Here's why Linux is easier than Windows:
    Package Managers! Apt-Get and Portage (among others) allow users to install programs MUCH easier than Windows can.
    Hardware Drivers. In SuSE, ALL the hardware is detected and installed automatically! How is this harder than Windows' constant disc changing and rebooting?

  6. #26
    Linux Engineer hazel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Harrow, UK
    Posts
    951
    Quote Originally Posted by cousinlucky View Post
    My suse 10 Linux os does nothing. It expects me as the user to do everything.
    I suspect that's a SuSE thing rather than a Linux thing. SuSE is intended for use in offices where the sysadmin is a professional IT manager with perhaps rather rigid ideas on what should be done, so it takes the ultra-conservative option and does nothing it isn't explicitly asked to do. I haven't noticed anything of that sort in Red Hat or Ubuntu.
    "I'm just a little old lady; don't try to dazzle me with jargon!"

  7. #27
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA, USA
    Posts
    28
    this is already happening. research, my friend.
    I hope you are correct.

  8. #28
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Somewhere On Station
    Posts
    27
    Quote Originally Posted by ozar View Post
    I gave up on both Windows and Linux a long time ago, but I still use Windows every day at work (forced), and then Linux every day at home (want to). Giving up on them doesn't stop me from using either of them.
    My attitude as well. I am required to know Windows for my J-O-B but prefer to have Linux in my hovel. Luckily I've convinced a few of my clients to allow me to put Linux in place as their server. They won't look back thru a Window for that now.

  9. #29
    Linux Enthusiast cousinlucky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    575
    Thank You Hazel!

    I also suspect that Novell is geared toward collecting money from its customers for tutoring and assistance. Their " plans " for such service are quite expensive.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •