Results 21 to 29 of 29
Originally Posted by dfxdeimos
You mean Intel hardware? nothing special inside a Mac anymore.
No I'm talking about peripherals. I know that's confusing because then I switch immediately to talking ...
- 07-16-2007 #21Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 180
No I'm talking about peripherals. I know that's confusing because then I switch immediately to talking about architectures in the next sentence. So I was trying to say this--
(a) You can't use all Mac peripherals on a pc. I know they're moving away from that it, but hey it was worth mentioning.
(b) How many architectures does Windows support? Contrast that with Debian. Maybe you don't realize that not all computing is done on Intel x86, x86_64.
That's a fictional case-- non-MS OSs are only 10% of the market. In a fair market where each OS has no more than like 30% of the user base, then yeah you'd be right. As it stands there is only one operating system that can do that, the one with the monopoly. The reality is that it's not profitable to supply drivers for other OSs, and full disclosure of proper documentation and specs for linux coders to write their own drivers is too compromising, it can show too many of their tricks to the competitors. MS had an advantage when it started and then it used unethical and illegal practices to achieve vendor lock in, and you think that somehow that is the fault of linux?I think it is fair. You don't need to have a monopoly to pressure hardware manufacturers, just a large enough base so that the manufacturer says, "Oh, maybe it would be profitable for us to supply docs & drivers."
- 07-16-2007 #22Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Posts
- 28
I do not think it is the fault of Linux.
My only point is that it is too bad that there isn't more of a single force in the Linux world that can put pressure on the hardware makers to provide docs to at least allow the community to build drivers.
- 07-16-2007 #23You're a Slackware user yourself, so I know where you're coming from. But Slack deserves a little more credit, so allow me to nuance this statement.
Originally Posted by Mahlerfan
Slackware is so by choice, it's a trade off. Ease is traded in for power and flexibility. And if you don't feel like compiling, rpm instead. Windows is so by default, without choice. There is one way of doing it. And only hints towards ease, IMHO... although they are getting better
And Slackpacks are easier to install than anything really.
That said, it comes down to taste, again...Can't tell an OS by it's GUI
- 07-17-2007 #24forum.guy
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- arch linux
- Posts
- 18,084
I gave up on both Windows and Linux a long time ago, but I still use Windows every day at work (forced), and then Linux every day at home (want to). Giving up on them doesn't stop me from using either of them.
oz
→ new members/users: read this first | new member faq
→ no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
→ please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.
- 07-17-2007 #25Here's why Linux is easier than Windows:
Package Managers! Apt-Get and Portage (among others) allow users to install programs MUCH easier than Windows can.
Hardware Drivers. In SuSE, ALL the hardware is detected and installed automatically! How is this harder than Windows' constant disc changing and rebooting?
- 07-17-2007 #26
I suspect that's a SuSE thing rather than a Linux thing. SuSE is intended for use in offices where the sysadmin is a professional IT manager with perhaps rather rigid ideas on what should be done, so it takes the ultra-conservative option and does nothing it isn't explicitly asked to do. I haven't noticed anything of that sort in Red Hat or Ubuntu.
"I'm just a little old lady; don't try to dazzle me with jargon!"
- 07-17-2007 #27Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Posts
- 28
I hope you are correct.this is already happening. research, my friend.
- 07-19-2007 #28Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- Somewhere On Station
- Posts
- 27
- 07-20-2007 #29
Thank You Hazel!
I also suspect that Novell is geared toward collecting money from its customers for tutoring and assistance. Their " plans " for such service are quite expensive.



Reply With Quote
