Howdy RobLinux,
I notice a lot of posts along this topic line, on
various forums. And they all seem to have a
certain consistency.
Aside from not including deb as one of the actual
choices, but that would just be you, possibly
thinking that deb itself wasn't a viable choice
When you say you want ...
>>
... the most suited distro for
me.
>>
That is quite impossible to answer, especially
considering your following comments. Besides,
who are you ?. Are you going to be who you think
you are next week, as you may be now, or are you
just a static person that dosen't change. !
>>
... Well anyways heres my chosen that I liked
and have used
>>
How come i get the feeling that your trying to
heard me into an idea that just suits you. Your
not really looking for an "open" opinion really.
Just something thats going to fit into what you
may have well already pre-conceived.
>>
Please don't vote according to your likes, but
according to whats best for a linux n00b.
>>
New it !, your not really interested in my
opinion/experience at all !
Some of the problems, so called "n00b's" seem
to have in common, is a total reluctance/fear,
to move away from the Windows mind set, that they
have been trained to except. On the one hand, there
sick of the insecurity of Windows installs, which,
by the way, directly relates to why Windows provides
that air of ease.
If you didn't have to bother using a "key" to get
into, and then start your car, well, i suppose
life would run a little smoother. But then you
probably wouldn't have your car for very long either.
And besides, remembering/learning how to not loose
your "key" ... Well, that ain't so hard really.
>>
So I dont need no Gentoo type stuff, I'm only 18 ,
I aint a geek either I'm just smart and have been
using a pc with a lot of trial-errors and do
not wish to go thru so much disappointment
I did with windows.
>>
Ok, "smart" ???, but reluctant
You seem to like "deb", well, distro hopping
can at least introduce a variety of possibilities,
but the differences will only boil down to the
maintenance utilities employed, along with the
"init" style used. I think the rest will just be
aesthetics associated with the users Window
Manager. A person needs to stick with something
over time, to really come to learn very much of
anything about it. After all, they really are all
the same !
Personally i started with RedHat 5.0, but went to
Woody as i found it easier to learn from, and
"debconf" was the most unintrusive maintanence system
i could find. Now, it's more a cross between
"testing/unstable", and with a newly upgraded
libc6_2.3.2. Still tweaking a few issues there

.
Once you over come the Windows indoctrination
thing, you'll probably find, what ever Linux
flavour your doing, surprisingly more simple than
you first though. Along with the satisfaction that
comes with actually being in control of your
system. Which means, of course, making decisions
regarding it.
If you can read and aren't afraid to experiment,
and know how to make backups from time to time,
and testing them, Then ... you won't have any
real problem.
No offence if that all sounds a bit patronising,
i don't think i actually mean it to be as such.
Oh, my vote ... deb of course
jm