Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 7 of 7
I did a new installation of Debian (sarge) and when the system tries to boot it says that the inittab file is not found and then asks for the run ...
  1. #1
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3

    inittab file missing

    I did a new installation of Debian (sarge) and when the system tries to boot it says that the inittab file is not found and then asks for the run level I want. I'm setting this up on an 80 gigabyte disk and have manually partitioned the disk. Does anyone have any suggestions on how I can get this to run?

  2. #2
    oz
    oz is online now
    forum.guy
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    arch linux
    Posts
    18,086
    Maybe your installation is corrupted. I'd try installing again if it were me. You can install again right over the same partitions.
    oz

    new members/users: read this first | new member faq
    no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
    please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.

  3. #3
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3

    Installed again

    I'm installing from CD's and I've tried it 4 times already. Any other suggestions? I have done installations from these CD's that have worked before but I'm thinking it might be my partition assignment. Here's what I've set up:

    IDE1 master (hda)
    Partition size type mount point
    ----------------------------------------
    #1 797.8 MB ext2 /
    #6 5.0 GB ext3 /boot
    #7 5.0 GB ext3 /var
    #8 10.0 GB ext3 /usr
    #12 5.0 GB ext3 /usr/local
    #11 1.0 GB ext3 fat16
    #10 2.5 GB ext3 /tmp
    #9 2.0 GB ext3 /etc
    #5 501.7 MB swap
    #13 10.0 GB ext3 /opt
    #14 10.0 GB ext3 /srv

    IDE1 slave (hdb)
    Partition size type mount point
    ---------------------------------------
    #1 20.0 GB ext3 /home
    #5 501.7 MB swap

    All the rest of the disks are free space right now. Did I get to deep into partitions here?

  4. #4
    oz
    oz is online now
    forum.guy
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    arch linux
    Posts
    18,086
    Quote Originally Posted by caitsdeo View Post
    Did I get to deep into partitions here?
    Yes, you did. Do you really need all those partitions?

    I usually just make /, swap, and /home partitions, and I don't really need the swap or /home partitions. I'm just thinking it might simply things for you if you go with fewer partitions.
    oz

    new members/users: read this first | new member faq
    no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
    please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.

  5. #5
    Linux Guru anomie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,692
    Never, ever make a separate filesystem for /etc. It needs to be part of /.

    You'll notice at boot time that / is mounted first (read-only) and then the startup continues from there. Guess what happens when it can't find any of the /etc files on the / filesystem. I think you found out.

  6. #6
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3
    Thank you. Having /etc back in the "/" file system did the trick. I now have a working system.

  7. #7
    Linux Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    CT --> PA
    Posts
    170
    You will also find that you (rather unecessarily) tied up about 4.5 gigs of space in the /boot, and unless you do a lot of served resources, /srv and /opt might be a little big also. To start off? You can always do the "all in one" partition trick and you will get a off and running system from the get-go.

    partitioning is always a disputed art.
    Chicks dig giant mechanized war machines

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •