Results 1 to 10 of 19
Hello everyone. I have been trying to get my "RangePlus Wireless Network USB Adapter" to work in Debian 5.0. I can only access the internet from a Linux distro by ...
- 12-10-2009 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 42
Need Help with Linksys WUSB100 ver.2
Hello everyone. I have been trying to get my "RangePlus Wireless Network USB Adapter" to work in Debian 5.0. I can only access the internet from a Linux distro by running a wire from a vent in my floor through the middle of my living room to my router... not too aestetically pleasing.
I have the device working without hitch on WinXP on the same computer, but am confused as to what I sohuld do now. I have downloaded ndiswrapper and am now kind of lost. I am not exactly new to Linux, but I haven't attempted any sort of compiling or anything, if that gives you an idea of where i'm at....
I'd really appreciate some help... The only reason I use XP right now is to use the internet. I am trying make no reason to have to use XP except for certain games, but internet is a huge part of my computing, and without it I really have no reason to use linux except to access my media fles on a seperate storage partition I have set up, and writing documents and stuff.
- 12-10-2009 #2
With the adapter plugged in, please post the output of
Code:lsusb lsmod
- 12-10-2009 #3
This may help too.
[other_os] Linksys WUSB100 wireless card working in Linux. - Ubuntu Forums
Different version of the adapter may use different wireless chipsets, however. If the output of lsusb shows the ID as 1737:0070, it should work.
- 12-10-2009 #4Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 42
"lsusb" gives:
"lsmod" gives:Code:Bus 003 Device 003: ID 1737:0078 Linksys Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 002 Device 002: ID 058f:9360 Alcor Micro Corp. 8-in-1 Media Card Reader Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Code:Module Size Used by rfcomm 28272 0 l2cap 17248 5 rfcomm bluetooth 44996 4 rfcomm,l2cap ppdev 6468 0 lp 8164 0 ipv6 235396 20 battery 10180 0 speedstep_lib 4516 0 cpufreq_userspace 3172 0 cpufreq_stats 3776 0 cpufreq_conservative 5960 0 cpufreq_ondemand 6476 0 freq_table 4224 2 cpufreq_stats,cpufreq_ondemand cpufreq_powersave 1856 0 loop 12748 0 parport_pc 22500 1 parport 30988 3 ppdev,lp,parport_pc serio_raw 4740 0 pcspkr 2432 0 psmouse 32336 0 snd_hda_intel 325720 1 snd_pcm 62660 1 snd_hda_intel snd_seq 41456 0 snd_timer 17800 2 snd_pcm,snd_seq snd_seq_device 6380 1 snd_seq snd 45636 7 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm,snd_seq,snd_timer,snd_seq_device soundcore 6368 1 snd snd_page_alloc 7816 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm i2c_piix4 7216 0 i2c_core 19828 1 i2c_piix4 ati_agp 6220 0 button 6096 0 shpchp 25528 0 pci_hotplug 23460 1 shpchp agpgart 28808 1 ati_agp evdev 8000 3 sd_mod 22200 0 ext3 105576 1 jbd 39476 1 ext3 mbcache 7108 1 ext3 ide_cd_mod 27684 0 cdrom 30176 1 ide_cd_mod ide_disk 10496 3 ide_pci_generic 3908 0 [permanent] usb_storage 77120 0 8139cp 16800 0 atiixp 3396 0 [permanent] sata_sil 7176 0 ide_core 96168 4 ide_cd_mod,ide_disk,ide_pci_generic,atiixp 8139too 20384 0 mii 4896 2 8139cp,8139too ata_generic 4676 0 ehci_hcd 28428 0 ohci_hcd 18532 0 usbcore 118192 4 usb_storage,ehci_hcd,ohci_hcd libata 140448 2 sata_sil,ata_generic scsi_mod 129548 3 sd_mod,usb_storage,libata dock 8304 1 libata thermal 15228 0 processor 32576 1 thermal fan 4196 0 thermal_sys 10856 3 thermal,processor,fan
- 12-10-2009 #5
Ok, your chip can work using the native driver, but you have to build it yourself and add in the id for the chipset.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1342593
I tend to default to using native drivers whenever possible. Unfortunately, this one is a little bit of a pain. But it does give you a chance to learn about that compiling you haven't done yet.
You could alternatively pursue the ndiswrapper route. You would need the windows xp driver for the card then. Not idea if ndiswrapper works with this chip or not.
- 12-10-2009 #6Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 42
Hmm... apt can't seem to find 'linux-headers-generic'.
I ran
instead and got:Code:apt-get install linux-headers
Code:Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Package linux-headers is a virtual package provided by: linux-headers-2.6.26-2-xen-686 2.6.26-19lenny2 linux-headers-2.6.26-2-vserver-686-bigmem 2.6.26-19lenny2 linux-headers-2.6.26-2-vserver-686 2.6.26-19lenny2 linux-headers-2.6.26-2-openvz-686 2.6.26-19lenny2 linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64 2.6.26-19lenny2 linux-headers-2.6.26-2-686-bigmem 2.6.26-19lenny2 linux-headers-2.6.26-2-686 2.6.26-19lenny2 linux-headers-2.6.26-2-486 2.6.26-19lenny2 linux-headers-2.6.26-1-xen-686 2.6.26-13lenny2 linux-headers-2.6.26-1-vserver-686-bigmem 2.6.26-13lenny2 linux-headers-2.6.26-1-vserver-686 2.6.26-13lenny2 linux-headers-2.6.26-1-openvz-686 2.6.26-13lenny2 linux-headers-2.6.26-1-amd64 2.6.26-13lenny2 linux-headers-2.6.26-1-686-bigmem 2.6.26-13lenny2 linux-headers-2.6.26-1-686 2.6.26-13lenny2 linux-headers-2.6.26-1-486 2.6.26-13lenny2 linux-headers-2.6-xen-686 2.6.26+17+lenny1 linux-headers-2.6-vserver-686-bigmem 2.6.26+17+lenny1 linux-headers-2.6-vserver-686 2.6.26+17+lenny1 linux-headers-2.6-openvz-686 2.6.26+17+lenny1 linux-headers-2.6-amd64 2.6.26+17+lenny1 linux-headers-2.6-686-bigmem 2.6.26+17+lenny1 linux-headers-2.6-686 2.6.26+17+lenny1 linux-headers-2.6-486 2.6.26+17+lenny1 You should explicitly select one to install. E: Package linux-headers has no installation candidate
I appreciate the help so far. I understand you are helping me on your time, so I am very grateful.
I am trying to learn to work through these kind of things rather than do what I use to do and try to find a different distro. I've tried about 40 different distros in the last year or two, and everytime I would encounter a problem (hardware not working "out-of-the-box" or something), I would turn around and try to find another distribution.
I am starting to see how wrong I was for doing that. All of that time I spent reformatting and repartitioning my hard drive, I could have spent tweaking a decent OS to fit me and my computer's needs. I was always just after instant gratification rather than the reliability of a custom system.
Anyways, thanks again.
- 12-10-2009 #7
Whoops, sorry, Debian refers to the headers package a little differently than Ubuntu.
Try is as souname -r outputs your current kernel version, so using that as a variable should get you the correct package.Code:apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r)
- 12-10-2009 #8It's how I try and give a little something back to the community. Otherwise I'd just be taking all this amazing software and not contributing anything in return. In the scheme of things, it's a small contribution, but better than nothing I hope.I appreciate the help so far. I understand you are helping me on your time, so I am very grateful.

I distro hopped for about a year before settling on Arch. It wasn't so much that this or that didn't work, but I had a hard time figuring out whyit didn't work - the "newbie friendly" distros had too much abstraction between me and the system. Arch doesn't hardly do anything for you, so while it takes a little more effort to set up, I know what was done because I did it, and I've found it just much much easier to maintain.I am trying to learn to work through these kind of things rather than do what I use to do and try to find a different distro. I've tried about 40 different distros in the last year or two, and everytime I would encounter a problem (hardware not working "out-of-the-box", would turn around and try to find another distribution.
Not to mention I never have to reinstall the next big release, since it's a rolling release distro, and I never have to find some obscure ppa repo to get the latest software, since new software releases are moved into the repos very quickly.
- 12-10-2009 #9Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 42
Hmm... Arch sound good now. You should be in advertising.

Thanks for the new code (and telling me what 'uname -r' does -- I've been wondering that), it installed fine.
I'll keep following the guide and let you know if there are any more hiccups.
- 12-10-2009 #10Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 42
What should I do instead of Ubuntu's
andCode:make
It's saying command not found...Code:make install


Reply With Quote
