Results 1 to 5 of 5
Hi folks,
Debian 5.0 32bit
On running aptitude update and then aptitude upgrade following warning noted
Code:
......
......
The following packages have been kept back:
libmono-accessibility2.0-cil libmono-cairo1.0-cil libmono-cairo2.0-cil
libmono-cecil-private-cil ...
- 06-21-2010 #1Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 1,546
Problem on running aptitude upgrade
Hi folks,
Debian 5.0 32bit
On running aptitude update and then aptitude upgrade following warning notedMonodevelop is running on this OS.Code:...... ...... The following packages have been kept back: libmono-accessibility2.0-cil libmono-cairo1.0-cil libmono-cairo2.0-cil libmono-cecil-private-cil libmono-corlib1.0-cil libmono-corlib2.0-cil libmono-data-tds1.0-cil libmono-data-tds2.0-cil libmono-dev libmono-getoptions2.0-cil libmono-i18n-west2.0-cil libmono-management2.0-cil libmono-peapi2.0-cil libmono-posix1.0-cil libmono-posix2.0-cil libmono-relaxng1.0-cil libmono-security1.0-cil libmono-security2.0-cil libmono-sharpzip0.84-cil libmono-sharpzip2.84-cil libmono-sqlite2.0-cil libmono-system-data1.0-cil libmono-system-data2.0-cil libmono-system-runtime1.0-cil libmono-system-runtime2.0-cil libmono-system-web1.0-cil libmono-system-web2.0-cil libmono-system1.0-cil libmono-system2.0-cil libmono-webbrowser0.5-cil libmono-winforms1.0-cil libmono-winforms2.0-cil libmono0 libmono1.0-cil libmono2.0-cil mono-2.0-devel mono-2.0-gac mono-csharp-shell mono-devel mono-gac mono-gmcs mono-mcs mono-runtime monodoc-base 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 44 not upgraded.
$ apt-cache policy monodevelopPlease advise what shall I do on above warning? TIACode:monodevelop: Installed: 1.0+dfsg-3 Candidate: 1.0+dfsg-3 Version table: 2.2.1+dfsg-1~bpo50+1 0 1 http://www.backports.org lenny-backports/main Packages *** 1.0+dfsg-3 0 500 http://ftp.hk.debian.org lenny/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
B.R.
satimis
- 06-22-2010 #2Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- CT
- Posts
- 7
This isn't really a warning per se, it's just letting you know there are potential updates for these packages but they are not being installed because you have pinned them to their current version, have not explicitly installed them, they may break other packages you have installed, or a few other things. I wouldn't worry about it. Unless you are having an issue with something else like your mono apps or mono development.
- 06-22-2010 #3Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 1,546
Hi,
It seems I have 2 mono running here.
$ apt-cache policy monodevelopCode:monodevelop: Installed: 1.0+dfsg-3 Candidate: 1.0+dfsg-3 Version table: 2.2.1+dfsg-1~bpo50+1 0 1 http://www.backports.org lenny-backports/main Packages *** 1.0+dfsg-3 0 500 http://ftp.hk.debian.org lenny/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
$ apt-cache policy mono-develThe second one is newer in version? What shall I do? TIACode:mono-devel: Installed: 2.4.2.3+dfsg-2~bpo50+1 Candidate: 2.6.3-1 Version table: 2.6.3-1 0 500 Index of / Packages 500 Index of / Packages *** 2.4.2.3+dfsg-2~bpo50+1 0 1 http://www.backports.org lenny-backports/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
B.R.
satimis
- 06-22-2010 #4
You mixed stable with an experimental repo, no big surprise that you can't update.
Debian Sid LXDE Kernel liquorix CPU Pentium IV 2.80GHz GeForce 9400 GT
Debian - "If you can't apt-get something, it isn't useful or doesn't exist"
Giant Debian sources.list | Debian upgrade script smxi | sysinfo script inxi
- 06-24-2010 #5Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 1,546


Reply With Quote

