Results 1 to 10 of 10
Hi all!
I'm a new debian user, but with a little experience on other distros (mainly suse).
I installed my etch system at work, on a new dual boot pc, ...
- 07-26-2007 #1
Second hard disk unrecognized
Hi all!
I'm a new debian user, but with a little experience on other distros (mainly suse).
I installed my etch system at work, on a new dual boot pc, and everything went ok. After a few weeks I added a second hard disk (identical to the first installed), and formatted it with FAT32 to create an exchange location for data between the two systems. On windows I found the second disk to work properly, while debian can't recognize it at all (no sdb entry in /dev).
Can anybody help me understanding what's wrong with the system?
Is it true that it might depend on a bug in the 2.6.18-4.i686 kernel?
Thanks a lot!
- 07-26-2007 #2
Hey,
first can I see the output you get from the following commands.
mount
ls /dev/
'mount' shows currently mounted devices whilest 'ls /dev/' shows what devices you have on your computer (even if they are not mounted). These two commands will also prove whether linux is actually detecting the hard drive.
You might also consider making a new directory for the hard drive you are wanting to mount.
mkdir /media/<some-name i.e. windows>
Good Luck.
- 07-26-2007 #3
Hi chadders!
Ok, here they are:
Code:$mount /dev/sda2 on / type ext3 (rw,errors=remount-ro) tmpfs on /lib/init/rw type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,mode=0755) proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) procbususb on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw) udev on /dev type tmpfs (rw,mode=0755) tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=620) /dev/sda8 on /home type ext3 (rw) /dev/sda7 on /prod type ext3 (rw) /dev/sda6 on /usr type ext3 (rw) /dev/sda1 on /windows type ntfs (ro,noexec,nosuid,nodev,gid=100,umask=0002)
As you can see, I have already mounted the windows system partition (XP -> NTFS) under /windows, and I have prepared an /exchange folder to mount sdb1 to.Code:$ls /dev adsp loop6 ptype sndstat tty32 tty60 usbdev2.1_ep81 audio loop7 ptypf stderr tty33 tty61 usbdev3.1_ep00 bus lp0 ram0 stdin tty34 tty62 usbdev3.1_ep81 cdrom MAKEDEV ram1 stdout tty35 tty63 usbdev4.1_ep00 cdrom1 mapper ram10 tty tty36 tty7 usbdev4.1_ep81 cdrw mem ram11 tty0 tty37 tty8 usbdev5.1_ep00 console mixer ram12 tty1 tty38 tty9 usbdev5.1_ep81 core net ram13 tty10 tty39 ttyp0 usbdev6.1_ep00 disk null ram14 tty11 tty4 ttyp1 usbdev6.1_ep81 dsp nvidia0 ram15 tty12 tty40 ttyp2 usbdev7.1_ep00 dvd nvidiactl ram2 tty13 tty41 ttyp3 usbdev7.1_ep81 dvd1 parport0 ram3 tty14 tty42 ttyp4 vcs dvdrw port ram4 tty15 tty43 ttyp5 vcs1 fd ppp ram5 tty16 tty44 ttyp6 vcs2 fd0 psaux ram6 tty17 tty45 ttyp7 vcs3 full ptmx ram7 tty18 tty46 ttyp8 vcs4 hde pts ram8 tty19 tty47 ttyp9 vcs5 hdf ptyp0 ram9 tty2 tty48 ttypa vcs6 hpet ptyp1 random tty20 tty49 ttypb vcs7 initctl ptyp2 rtc tty21 tty5 ttypc vcsa input ptyp3 sda tty22 tty50 ttypd vcsa1 kmem ptyp4 sda1 tty23 tty51 ttype vcsa2 kmsg ptyp5 sda2 tty24 tty52 ttypf vcsa3 log ptyp6 sda3 tty25 tty53 ttyS0 vcsa4 loop ptyp7 sda5 tty26 tty54 ttyS1 vcsa5 loop0 ptyp8 sda6 tty27 tty55 ttyS2 vcsa6 loop1 ptyp9 sda7 tty28 tty56 ttyS3 vcsa7 loop2 ptypa sda8 tty29 tty57 urandom xconsole loop3 ptypb shm tty3 tty58 usbdev1.1_ep00 zero loop4 ptypc snapshot tty30 tty59 usbdev1.1_ep81 loop5 ptypd snd tty31 tty6 usbdev2.1_ep00
But I have no sdb to mount...
!
I hope you could help me...
- 07-26-2007 #4
Please post the output of 'fdisk -l' command.
It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit.
New Users: Read This First
- 07-26-2007 #5
Hi devils_casper!
Here for you (but I'm afraid it would't be a good new):
Any idea?Code:$fdisk -l Disk /dev/sda: 320.0 GB, 320072933376 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 38913 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 20397 163838871 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sda2 20398 30123 78124095 83 Linux /dev/sda3 30124 38913 70605675 f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/sda5 30124 31096 7815591 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda6 31097 33528 19535008+ 83 Linux /dev/sda7 33529 35960 19535008+ 83 Linux /dev/sda8 35961 38913 23719941 83 Linux
- 07-26-2007 #6
it appears to me that sda3 recognised.
To mount simply do this:
mount <device> <desired location>
e.g.
mount /dev/sda3 /media/sda3
I chose against mounting sda5 as it appears to be your swap.
I hope I have said the right thing, devils_casper can correct me if I am wrong lol. Unfortunately I do not know how to make the devices load at boot. Someone else may be able to enlighten us both whilst I search the internet for the answer.
- 07-26-2007 #7
Debian is not recognizing second Hard Disk.
If Windows OS is recognizing Second Hard Disk, it means Cables are plugged-in properly and its not disabled in BIOS.
Check the output of 'dmesg | less' command. Does it show any error message related to sdb?It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit.
New Users: Read This First
- 07-26-2007 #8
Ok, here are the answers:
1.
The sda3 is an extended partition within which i created other partitions such as sda5 to sda8: they all work properly.
2.
The output of the dmesg command follows: I think a couple errors about scsi1 are shown in the first part of the output message, but similar errors are shown on scsi2 and scsi3, so I really don't know... (furthermore, I am not too familiar with low level system messages, although I am practice of partitioning and hardware...)
Several lines ahead it is present the following section about sda, properly working.Code:ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: version 2.00 ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 -- P1 -- ] ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1f.2[B] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 177 PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:1f.2 to 64 ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xEC00 ctl 0xE882 bmdma 0xE400 irq 177 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xE800 ctl 0xE482 bmdma 0xE408 irq 177scsi0 : ata_piix ata1.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 625142448 sectors: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32) ata1.00: ata1: dev 0 multi count 16 ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 scsi1 : ata_piix ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xE807 Vendor: ATA Model: ST3320620AS Rev: 3.AA Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 ata_piix 0000:00:1f.5: MAP [ P0 -- P1 -- ] ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1f.5[B] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 177 PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:1f.5 to 64 ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xD400 ctl 0xD082 bmdma 0xC880 irq 177 ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xD000 ctl 0xCC02 bmdma 0xC888 irq 177 scsi2 : ata_piix ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xD407 scsi3 : ata_piix ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xD007 ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:05:03.0[A] -> GSI 21 (level, low) -> IRQ 58 ohci1394: fw-host0: OHCI-1394 1.0 (PCI): IRQ=[58] MMIO=[feaff000-feaff7ff] Max Packet=[2048] IR/IT contexts=[4/8] Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2 ahci 0000:02:00.0: version 2.0 ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:00.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 169 ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:02:00.0 to 64 ahci 0000:02:00.0: AHCI 0001.0000 32 slots 2 ports 3 Gbps 0x3 impl SATA mode ahci 0000:02:00.0: flags: 64bit ncq pm led clo pmp pio slum part ata5: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF8908100 ctl 0x0 bmdma 0x0 irq 169 ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF8908180 ctl 0x0 bmdma 0x0 irq 169 scsi4 : ahci ieee1394: Host added: ID:BUS[0-00:1023] GUID[0011d800013143e1] ata5: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) scsi5 : ahci ata6: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
So I have two questions for you: is it possible that after an extended partition on sda there cannot be any other primary partition, even if on sdb? And more: before installing the second hd I used my pen drive, which was mounted on sdb: does the system keep memory of previously installed disks, conflicting with the new hardware configuration?Code:Probing IDE interface ide3... SCSI device sda: 625142448 512-byte hdwr sectors (320073 MB) sda: Write Protect is off sda: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 625142448 512-byte hdwr sectors (320073 MB) sda: Write Protect is off sda: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 <<6>hde: ATAPI 52X DVD-ROM drive, 256kB Cache, UDMA(33) Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20 sda5 sda6 sda7 sda8 > sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda
I am bewildered...
- 07-26-2007 #9Its possible to create Primary Partition after Extended Partition and sda has nothing to do with sdb. Both represents separate Hard Disks and It doesn't matter what type of Partition Structure both disks have,is it possible that after an extended partition on sda there cannot be any other primary partition, even if on sdb?
No. System doesn't reserve Device Names.before installing the second hd I used my pen drive, which was mounted on sdb: does the system keep memory of previously installed disks, conflicting with the new hardware configuration?
Are you sure that Second Hard does not have any problem? Is it enabled in BIOS? Are you Dual Booting?It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit.
New Users: Read This First
- 07-26-2007 #10Yes, the second hard disk works properly in windows: I tried to create folders, copy to and retrieve files from it before posting this thread, to ensure it was a software problem I couldn't face by myself. Persuaded everithing was ok on hardware level, I didn't examined BIOS.Are you sure that Second Hard does not have any problem? Is it enabled in BIOS? Are you Dual Booting?
Your last question made me uncertain about all, and I finally entered BIOS setup mode: although the disk was successfully recognized and set, I found it connected as SATA3!!!
I shut down immediately and opened the pc: the disk was installed by a computer technician on the third SATA motherboard connector, automatically setting it as SLAVE and leaving the SATA2 connector empty.
I don't know exactly why, but I had the pulse to move the connector from SATA3 to SATA2 port, rebooted and *WOW* everithing worked!!!
I must confess I feel a bit stupid after this, but the different behaviour of windows and linux about the disk management left me quite lost, and far away thinking it could be an hardware connection problem (is it?!? Not sure...). By the way, I'm grateful to you for your help in persisting on the problem, and for the hit suggestion which let me discover the problem.
I hope I could be of any help to you.
Thanks a lot!


Reply With Quote
