Results 1 to 10 of 12
I am about to dl BSD for the first time. I am very interested in DragonFlyBSD; however, since FreeBSD was recommended to me earlier in this forum I wish to ...
- 02-15-2005 #1Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Vancouver
- Posts
- 1,366
FreeBSD 4.11 or 5.3
I am about to dl BSD for the first time. I am very interested in DragonFlyBSD; however, since FreeBSD was recommended to me earlier in this forum I wish to try it first and to learn the strings.
Now I went to the ftp to dl FreeBSD and I figured that 5.3 would be the newer version but there is a version 4.11 that has a newer timestamp on it.
What do you guys recommend?Operating System: GNU Emacs
- 02-15-2005 #2Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 826
5.3 is now considered the STABLE branch of FreeBSD, so it is recommended. With 5.2.1 and earlier, 4.x was considered the STABLE and 5.x was the new technology release, buth this has changed since the release of 5.3
- 02-15-2005 #3Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Vancouver
- Posts
- 1,366
ah, ok thanks man, yay! time to dl
Operating System: GNU Emacs
- 02-15-2005 #4Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 826
By the way, you can probably save yourself some time and blank CDs by only downloading and burning the first CD. Disc 2 is a LiveCD for diagnostics, etc. and I've never really had to use that.
- 02-15-2005 #5Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Vancouver
- Posts
- 1,366
so I don't need
There are also: disc2.iso
miniinst.iso
bootonly.iso
?Operating System: GNU Emacs
- 02-15-2005 #6Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 826
Correct, you only need disc1.iso. miniinst is just what it says it is - a minimum install. bootonly.iso is also self-explanatory - a boot only CD.
Originally Posted by genesus
- 03-20-2005 #7Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 6
If FTP presents problems, I've had better luck with BitTorrent:
http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/5.3-torrent/
- 03-21-2005 #8Linux User
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- USA, Michigan, Detroit
- Posts
- 329
One big diffrence is that 5.3 is Xorg and 4.11 is XFree. They also removed the X configuration tool from the install proccess and all x configuration is done be editing the config files. I liked the x configuration tool with the earlier branch because it gave you something close to edit instead of starting from scratch.
Long live the revolution!
Have a nice day.
If you want real change vote Libertarian!
- 03-21-2005 #9Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 826
All the installer did was:
Originally Posted by copycon
True that it might be nice to do it for you, and FBSD newbs probably don't know they need to do this, but think about it - Xorg isn't part of the base system, it's third party software. There's no need for the FBSD installer to do anything for the user with regard to third party apps.Code:xorgcfg -textmode
BTW, it was 5.2.1 --> 5.3 in which xorgcfg -textmode was removed from sysinstall.
- 04-14-2005 #10Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Utah
- Posts
- 18
Use this walk-thru for installing X
Here is a walk thru for installing X.
Hope it helps.
http://www.bsdcertification.com/guides/index.php
Thanks


Reply With Quote
