Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 12 of 12
Originally Posted by mahlerfan That response doesn't even make sense. If my hardware wasn't supported properly by FreeBSD, then why would I have no problems with the earlier release? Hmm, ...
  1. 06-23-2007 #11
    anomie
    anomie is offline
    Linux Guru anomie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,692
    Quote Originally Posted by mahlerfan
    That response doesn't even make sense. If my hardware wasn't supported properly by FreeBSD, then why would I have no problems with the earlier release?
    Hmm, let's see. Different supported hardware, different kernel, different base system, different drivers. Is that understandable enough?

    Let me put this another way. I communicate with a lot of FreeBSD folks, and amazingly you are the only one who has reported that 6.2 is significantly less stable than 5.5. Let me rephrase that: You are the only person in the history of computing who has equated FreeBSD to Windows ME.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-23-2007 #12
    fawz
    fawz is offline
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    23
    Well, my FreeBSD never crashed and it is indeed very stable. I just learned how to install it properly so the problems I had in the begining were related to software compatibility installation. Even installing it wrongly I had no crashes.

    Can you show us a bug by setting up a command line or something like that ?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules