Results 1 to 9 of 9
Hiya,
Looking at the licensing issues for the content that people will enter into the Wiki, there are some licences Here , but what do people generally feel appropriate? Do ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 07-23-2004 #1Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- London, UK
- Posts
- 3,284
linuxforums wiki - content license
Hiya,
Looking at the licensing issues for the content that people will enter into the Wiki, there are some licences Here, but what do people generally feel appropriate? Do you guys want to go with one of the creativecommons licences, another license, or a custom written license?
Jason
- 07-23-2004 #2
I think that the Attribution-ShareAlike License looks good, This isnt the result of much reaserch, i just saw it on the link you posted, then stumbled across it in a book that i was reading, so it looks good enough for me!
- 07-23-2004 #3Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Uppsala, Sweden
- Posts
- 1,278
I think the creative commons licence is ideal for this kind of work. it is quite a basic - "you can copy/modify it providing you give us due credit" the creative commons licence can also include _not_ allowing commercial reselling of the information, this is something I think should be included as who knows.. we may want to produce a book :)
Proud to be a GNU/Gentoo Linux user!
- 07-23-2004 #4
wow, that would be, sadly, kinda cool, but the other part i like of the creative commons liscense is the requirment that it stays open, we can use a liscens that alows others to put our content on their site or w/e but they have to keep it open, makes happy.
- 07-23-2004 #5Well, the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/) looks even better
Originally Posted by qub333 
I like CC's licenses, they got 3 nice formats "Human-Readable Commons Deed", "Lawyer-Readable Legal Code" and "Machine-Readable Digital Code" easy to understand
I thinki it's easiest (and safest -thining of the lawyer readble text) to use an existing license, anbd the CC's licenses are easy to understand and do what we want it to - provide a simple way of tailoring a license fitting our needs
So, if you missed it, i vote/suggest for the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License.Regards Scienitca (registered user #335819 - http://counter.li.org )
--
A master is nothing more than a student who knows something of which he can teach to other students.
- 07-23-2004 #6
i dont know much about licenses so i will just go with the group on this one
BIG K aka Kyle
Programming Forums
www.kylekonline.com
Please don\'t PM me for help-- ask in the forums instead!
- 07-23-2004 #7
- 07-23-2004 #8
Add another vote for Att-NonCom-Share license.
- 07-23-2004 #9Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Uppsala, Sweden
- Posts
- 1,278
Me too
Proud to be a GNU/Gentoo Linux user!


Reply With Quote
