Results 11 to 18 of 18
The way I understand it, you pay for 6 months at a time to be listed in those slots.
I think the "Recommended Sites" slots on the DistroWatch front page ...
- 08-01-2006 #11forum.guy
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- arch linux
- Posts
- 18,086
The way I understand it, you pay for 6 months at a time to be listed in those slots.
I think the "Recommended Sites" slots on the DistroWatch front page are paid-for slots, too. Maybe Core Wizard will see this and verify one way, or the other.oz
→ new members/users: read this first | new member faq
→ no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
→ please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.
- 08-01-2006 #12I agree, but I still don't think it's our business to tell DistroWatch how to run their site.
Originally Posted by KenJackson Registered Linux user #270181
TechieMoe's Tech Rants
- 08-01-2006 #13
We used to be listed on each distros page.
I used to use the link to LFDO from DW if mine wasn't working for some reason.
I still visit DW daily.How to know if you are a geek.
when you respond to "get a life!" with "what's the URL?"
- Birger
New users read The FAQ
- 08-02-2006 #14
Joint Effort
What I really Think is a combined effort and a joining of sites:
Linuxforums, with Linuxhardware.org, and phoronix site. all together in what neat little package.
what do you guys think of this?
- 08-02-2006 #15
Ummm, it doesn't really work that way. These various enterprises each have their own turf hammered out, a more or less comfortable place to do their thing. Cramming them all onto one site not only steps on numerous toes, it isn't even necessary with the click-jump nature of the web. Bigger isn't necessarily better.
It's the sort of thing which can sometimes happen naturally(money issues, some people need to move on, etc.), but it's rarely done because someone suggests "hey, Tom's hardware and Slashdot should merge!".
DT
- 08-11-2006 #16
Well, it turns out that ozar's understanding is correct. Ladislav Bodnar of DistroWatch replied to my email.
Although it doesn't say so, the "Alternative User Forums" field comprises
of sponsored links - i.e. the maintainers of those sites pay DistroWatch a
monthly fee to be listed there. This is one way we raise cash to maintain
the site. LinuxForums.org has indicated that it might join in at some stage
so hopefully you'll see it listed there soon.
- 08-11-2006 #17
Further clarification in email from DistroWatch's Ladislav Bodnar:
Just to clarify things after reading the forum comments:
1. The "Recommended Sites" section on the main page is NOT "paid-for".
2. Distributions do not pay for being listed on DistroWatch, although some
of them have bought banners (Turbolinux, MEPIS, Xandros and a few smaller
ones).
3. The only places where sponsored content is not clearly marked on the site
are "Alternative User Forums" and "Alternative Download Sites". The rest of
the site is clean.
- 08-11-2006 #18forum.guy
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- arch linux
- Posts
- 18,086
KenJackson - thanks for letting us know how it works.
oz
→ new members/users: read this first | new member faq
→ no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
→ please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.


Reply With Quote
