Results 1 to 10 of 21
I just got 3d acceleration going with Slackware 10.1 with the 2.6.10 kernel but couldn't find a point of reference anywhere to determine how it is actually performing. Does this ...
- 03-11-2005 #1
glxgears
I just got 3d acceleration going with Slackware 10.1 with the 2.6.10 kernel but couldn't find a point of reference anywhere to determine how it is actually performing. Does this look good, middle-of-the-road or bad?
Code:16629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3325.800 FPS 16631 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3326.200 FPS 16628 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3325.600 FPS 16628 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3325.600 FPS 16626 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3325.200 FPS 16626 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3325.200 FPS 16625 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3325.000 FPS 16625 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3325.000 FPS 16625 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3325.000 FPS 16625 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3325.000 FPS 16624 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3324.800 FPS 16600 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3320.000 FPS 17537 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3507.400 FPS
- 03-11-2005 #2Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- Rockin' in the USA!!!
- Posts
- 603
The default size for glxgears is very small, but that looks somewhat high, try running it in fullscreen, I get about 350 FPS on fullscreen with my Radeon 9200 ALL IN WONDER PRO
- 03-11-2005 #3
Thanks. Here it is at full screen...
Look OK?Code:2266 frames in 5.0 seconds = 453.200 FPS 2276 frames in 5.0 seconds = 455.200 FPS 2277 frames in 5.0 seconds = 455.400 FPS 2277 frames in 5.0 seconds = 455.400 FPS 2277 frames in 5.0 seconds = 455.400 FPS 2276 frames in 5.0 seconds = 455.200 FPS 2277 frames in 5.0 seconds = 455.400 FPS 2277 frames in 5.0 seconds = 455.400 FPS 2277 frames in 5.0 seconds = 455.400 FPS 2276 frames in 5.0 seconds = 455.200 FPS 2277 frames in 5.0 seconds = 455.400 FPS 2274 frames in 5.0 seconds = 454.800 FPS
- 03-11-2005 #4
Anyone?
- 03-11-2005 #5Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- 127.0.0.1
- Posts
- 113
it looks fine, that is a good amount of fps, you will be happy with it
. I cannot say the same about your video card, if you have a radeon. I get nothing but **** from ati, the drivers are absolutely horrible. I cannot use any programs that require 3d exelleration with the drivers installed because my computer locks up. Threw in a nvidia card, and it works beautifully.
- 03-11-2005 #6
I bought a new MX4000 Plus to replace my tried and true Geforce Ti 42000 SE that hosed a fan. The MX won't work right with the new Nvidia drivers, so I had to rig up a fan for my 42000 SE. It's working pretty well, but I hope Nvidia will come out with a fix for MX so I can use the MX 4000 Plus. I just got through playing Team Fortress for about an hour, and all seemed to be working as well as before. I'm afraid I'm not real educated on FPS and what is good or bad...
- 03-11-2005 #7Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Farnborough, UK
- Posts
- 1,305
You should leave the glxgears window sized as is and don't cover it with anything.
FPs looks fine. For comparison my GForce MMX 2, 64Mb gets about 750 fps.
- 03-11-2005 #8
Hi Chris H,
What do you mostly credit for the FPS you have? The card? Your processor? Everything together? What would be the best ways I could go about increasing FPS? I have:
120 G HD
2 G Pentium 4
512 RAM
GeForce Ti 4200 Plus AGP 128 mb
- 03-11-2005 #9Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Farnborough, UK
- Posts
- 1,305
It's the card and the correct driver.
There are one or two tweaks that people claim can speed up the fps for nvidia cards but I can't remember where I saw them
- 03-11-2005 #10
If I get output of below 1000fps that means my 3D acceleration isn't working. With properly installed drivers I usually hit around 7500-9800fps.
Registered Linux user #270181
TechieMoe's Tech Rants


Reply With Quote
