Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 2 of 2
Is there any advantage to using an audio server like jacks or arts? Right now I'm using straight alsa, but I've grown curious......
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
  1. #1
    Linux Engineer Javasnob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    942

    Audio servers


    Is there any advantage to using an audio server like jacks or arts? Right now I'm using straight alsa, but I've grown curious...
    Flies of a particular kind, i.e. time-flies, are fond of an arrow.

    Registered Linux User #408794

  2. #2
    Linux User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    401
    Alsa is a great system. You can do almost everything.

    Each audio server has its peculiarities (correct word? ). I've not investigated a lot, but arts is an audio synthetizer (so you can generate sound building a "network" of audio generators/modifiers); esd is an network audio server (so you can hear sound thru a network).

    Actually I'm using arts because its integration in the KDE enviroment (and because I'm too lazy to setup the ALSA dmix plugin, wich permits to open multiple times the audio device mixing audio streams).

    IHMO, ALSA should be enought for most desktop users. (for example, I've read an ALSA configuration to join multiple stereo audio card to have a single virtual audio card of 2/4/6 indipendent channels!!!)
    When using Windows, have you ever told "Ehi... do your business?"
    Linux user #396597 (http://counter.li.org)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •