Results 11 to 14 of 14
The idea is that EVERYTHING should be compiled with the new toolchain, including the new toolchain. Hence the recompiling of the toolchain twice.
Yeah...I wouldn't have done this if it ...
- 12-07-2005 #11Trusted Penguin
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Posts
- 3,228
The idea is that EVERYTHING should be compiled with the new toolchain, including the new toolchain. Hence the recompiling of the toolchain twice.
Yeah...I wouldn't have done this if it wasn't gcc. For regular updates (including other members of the toolchain), no way.DISTRO=Arch
Registered Linux User #388732
- 12-07-2005 #12Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- The DairyLand
- Posts
- 1,666
yeah -e is only nessary if you either are changing the gcc version or to rebuild a busted toolchain
~Mike ~~~ Forum Rules
Testing? What's that? If it compiles, it is good, if it boots up, it is perfect. ~ Linus Torvalds
http://loft306.org
- 12-07-2005 #13Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- CA, but from N.Ireland
- Posts
- 2,413
So I don't need to follow dylunio's advice (which would probably take me a week anyway
)??
Registered Linux user #388328 || Registered LFS user #15880
AMD 64 X2 4600+ :: 2X1GB DDR2 800 :: GeForce 9400 GT 512MB :: ASUS M2N32 Deluxe :: 4X250GB SATAII
Need instant help? Try us on IRC -- #linuxforums on freenode
- 12-07-2005 #14Trusted Penguin
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Posts
- 3,228
Nope. I've done many updates, and this is the only time I've ever done it this way. And I'm doing fine.
DISTRO=Arch
Registered Linux User #388732
Reply With Quote 
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
