Results 1 to 5 of 5
Hi
I've been trying everything I can to solve this problem, but so far no luck.
I am a total newb at this though, only been using linux as a ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 12-06-2010 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 4
can't activate raid0 array after kernel upgrade
Hi
I've been trying everything I can to solve this problem, but so far no luck.
I am a total newb at this though, only been using linux as a main OS for a few weeks.
I'm running Arch linux, kernel 2.6.36 (it was working fine on 2.6.33)
My raid array is on the onboard intel controller (Gigabyte EX58-UD3R mobo). It also has a GSATA controller which I have tried as well but it's the same problem with that one.
It's a 2 disk raid0 array and I use a ~300GB partition of it as a system drive for my Windows 7 installation.
I can boot from the array and windows works flawlessly on it, but as soon as I boot into linux it gets all messed up. I can't activate with dmraid or mdadm and when I reboot from linux the array FAILS in the raid bios showing only one drive as a part of the array. (both drives are detected though, but only one of them shows "raid-active").
It starts to work again after cold-boot though, which is pretty weird to me.
It's always the same disk that fails too.
I included some info from my kernel log and fdisk
the disks appear like this
and here's a few lines from my kernel.log that I thought might be relevant.Code:Disk /dev/sdd: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders, total 1953525168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0xb876c595 Disk /dev/sdd doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/sde: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders, total 1953525168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x1c7fba32 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sde1 * 2048 206847 102400 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sde2 206848 552962047 276377600 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/sde3 552962048 3907033087 1677035520 7 HPFS/NTFS
andCode:Dec 6 05:04:54 behemoth kernel: sde: sde1 sde2 sde3 Dec 6 05:04:54 behemoth kernel: sde: p3 size 3354071040 extends beyond EOD, enabling native capacity Dec 6 05:04:54 behemoth kernel: ata9: hard resetting link
you can see the entire log here - pastebin.com/duWu8zYBCode:Dec 6 05:04:54 behemoth kernel: sd 8:0:0:0: [sde] 1953525168 512-byte logical blocks: (1.00 TB/931 GiB) Dec 6 05:04:54 behemoth kernel: sde: detected capacity change from 1000203804160 to 1000204886016 Dec 6 05:04:54 behemoth kernel: sde: sde1 sde2 sde3 Dec 6 05:04:54 behemoth kernel: sde: p3 size 3354071040 extends beyond EOD, truncated Dec 6 05:04:54 behemoth kernel: sd 8:0:0:0: [sde] Attached SCSI disk
now I added this to my mdadm.conf, not sure if it's right though.
but when I do "mdadm --assemble --scan"Code:ARRAY /dev/md0 devices=/dev/sdd2,/dev/sde2
I get the following output
All I can think of is that it seems like the system is reading the partition table of /dev/sde as it would a single non-raided disk and therefore it looks like the partition is bigger then the disk it self so it looks like its failing.Code:mdadm: /dev/sde2 has no superblock - assembly aborted
But I don't know how I can fix it.
If someone could point me in the right direction or even explain some of those things in the kernel log it would great.
Thanks in advance
--raginaot
- 12-06-2010 #2
Have you added that disk before with
If /dev/sde2 has never been part of the array before it doesn't have a RAID superblock.Code:mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sde2
Refining Linux Advent calendar: “24 Outstanding ZSH Gems”
- 12-06-2010 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 4
I have not, and I can't since appearantly md0 doesn't exist
But I never tried mdadm before I started having problems, I always used dmraid.
Just did "dmraid -ay" and it was automatically activated and the partitions were created as /dev/dm-2 and /dev/dm-3 so I could mount them.
If I try that now I get:
But I tried creating a new array usingCode:/dev/sdd: "jmicron" and "isw" formats discovered (using isw)! ERROR: isw: wrong number of devices in RAID set "isw_ceijhcahbb_TERARAOD" [1/2] on /dev/sdd RAID set "isw_ceijhcahbb_TERARAOD" was not activated ERROR: device "isw_ceijhcahbb_TERARAOD" could not be found
but the output I get isCode:sudo mdadm --create /dev/md0 -l0 -n2 -c128 /dev/sde2 /dev/sdd2
so now it's having problem adding sdd2 :SCode:mdadm: super1.x cannot open /dev/sdd2: No such file or directory mdadm: /dev/sdd2 is not suitable for this array. mdadm: create aborted
am I doing it wrong?
But like I said in the first post, as soon as I boot into linux, the second disk in the array is deactivated in the raid BIOS so I'm certain there is some underlying problem here.
I don't know, I'm gonna get some sleep and hack around some more in the "morning" :P
edit: stupid me, I seem to have permanently borked the array somehow. Thank god for backups...
I created a new one and now mdadm seems to be automatically creating this device on boot called /dev/md127 1717.3GB of size and with no partition table.Last edited by raginaot; 12-06-2010 at 07:26 AM.
- 12-06-2010 #4
Indeed, you use the fake hardware RAID of your motherboard. That's always delicate.
To rebuild your array you should go with dmraid -R. Something like that:Maybe you also have to play around with your BIOS settings a bit. You can find more information here: [opensuse] Removing a failed disk from a dmraid arrayCode:dmraid -R isw_ceijhcahbb_TERARAOD /dev/sde2
But I'm not an expert here at all so I won't be able to give you further advice if that doesn't work.Refining Linux Advent calendar: “24 Outstanding ZSH Gems”
- 12-06-2010 #5Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 4
IT WORKS

I'm not entirely sure what I did, but I started by permanently ****ing up the array with some mdadm command, then I deleted it in bios, then I had to delete all the partitions in another windows machine cause the table was so majorly fubar linux thought one of the drives was several PB in size :S
Then I created a new array, a few reboots, banged my head on the keyboard for a while and sent Linus Torvalds an angry letter and somehow it's working now.
Cheers for trying to help manko. appreciate it


Reply With Quote

