Results 1 to 10 of 11
It's either a 750GB 7200RPM SATA hard drive, or a 256GB SSD.
Which one should I use? Would the smaller SSD be worse than a larger regular hard drive? Or ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 05-28-2012 #1
Should I get a regular hard drive or an SSD?
It's either a 750GB 7200RPM SATA hard drive, or a 256GB SSD.
Which one should I use? Would the smaller SSD be worse than a larger regular hard drive? Or does the performance boost make up for this?
- 05-28-2012 #2forum.guy
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- arch linux
- Posts
- 18,733
I've been using fast SSDs in a couple of my machines for the last two years now, and still run mechanical hard drives in four other machines. While I've had no issues with the SSDs, I still slightly prefer the regular hard drives. The main advantage to SSDs is the speed boost, silent operation, and the cooler running temps. They have a few disadvantages, too, but price still being the biggest. There's little doubt that mechanical hard disks will eventually be replaced with SSDs, but that all said, I ordered two more 7200 rpm regular hard disks just yesterday.
oz
- 05-28-2012 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Corvallis, Oregon
- Posts
- 8
The specs on SSD's vary all over the place, I initially got a couple that were probably quite a bit slower than the HD's I was replacing. Caveat Emptor. My current desktop has a RAID 0 pair of OCZ Vertex-3 120GB drives. They do actually move things along. Check storargereview.com for their current recommendations. If you are on a budget the WD Caviar Black drives are a nice compromise.
Note that a fast SATA-3 SSD can saturate a SATA-2 connection. The only way around this is to upgrade to SATA-3 motherboard or adapter.
I still use one of the original slow Patriot 32GB drives in a car computer where speed really does not matter.
- 05-29-2012 #4Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 12
- 05-29-2012 #5
I'm sorry, I wasn't specific. It was a laptop, and price is an issue now that I think about it. Because of this, I am probably going to get a hard drive. However, would laptop/desktop really make a difference?
- 05-29-2012 #6Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 3
- 05-29-2012 #7
I disagree. There are quite a few situations where using SSDs would be impractical, and I think that the technology has a long way to go before it can really be adopted for those uses. At my job, we have media players that are constantly accessing content from a separate content drive 24/7; we've gone through several different makes of hard drive and we've managed to kill them all, until we settled on Seagate SV drives which are designed for 24/7 surveillance systems. These have served us well for the past few years. SSD drives would be dead in no time from that kind of workload.
- 05-29-2012 #8forum.guy
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- arch linux
- Posts
- 18,733
- 05-29-2012 #9Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 3
- 05-30-2012 #10Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Corvallis, Oregon
- Posts
- 8
Interesting; have you actually tried an SSD in this application? SSD's wear out due to write cycles and my impression is you have an ideal read-mostly condition where it would last nearly forever and for server usage it would not suffer as much from latency and seek time delays.
For a server you can get an "enterprise class" drives which have better specs including longevity and speed at a higher price.


Reply With Quote

