Results 1 to 4 of 4
Hello everybody. I'm planning to assembly a PC. The following is my options:
1. phenom ii x4 965
2. bulldozer fx 8320
3. intel i5/ e3-1235.
Which one performs better ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 12-28-2012 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Tianjin China
- Posts
- 5
which cpu perfomrs better in kernel compilation
Hello everybody. I'm planning to assembly a PC. The following is my options:
1. phenom ii x4 965
2. bulldozer fx 8320
3. intel i5/ e3-1235.
Which one performs better when doing this? Do you have any suggestions?
Thanks.
- 12-28-2012 #2Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Virginia, USA
- Posts
- 561
Phoronix releases / compiles benchmarks for kernel compiling. Check them out.
- 12-28-2012 #3Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Virginia, USA
- Posts
- 561
Also, make sure the processor you select has all the technologies you want. Specifically speaking, I know that Intel VT-d isn't included on all processors, which is necessary if you want to virtualize 64 bit OSs.
- 12-31-2012 #4Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
- Posts
- 10,152
More cores == more threads == faster operation when running complex or multiple processes. When building a kernel, I use 8 cores with the -j 8 (8 jobs) argument to the make command. A kernel that takes 2 hours on a single core (default) will be done in 15 minutes with 8 cores. As to whether the AMD or Intel chips are faster core-by-core is something I don't know, but I think the current/latest intel CPUs have faster I/O (CPU<->RAM) than AMD these days, and that is critical to kernel builds.
Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!


Reply With Quote
