Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 13 of 13
Ifconfig gives exactly the same results as it did before...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
  1. #11
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    14

    Ifconfig gives exactly the same results as it did before

  2. #12
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    14
    Just to see what happened, I switched over to the onboard NIC, gave it a static ip and tried ifconfig again, here are the results. Does this make things any clearer?

    oot@1[~]# ifconfig
    eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:BF:E4:A6:11
    inet addr:192.168.0.10 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
    inet6 addr: fe80::250:bfff:fee4:a611/64 Scope:Link
    UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
    RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:148 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
    RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:10708 (10.4 KiB)
    Interrupt:11 Base address:0x8000

    lo Link encap:Local Loopback
    inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
    inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
    UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
    RX packets:124 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:124 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
    RX bytes:9739 (9.5 KiB) TX bytes:9739 (9.5 KiB)

    root@1[~]#

  3. #13
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    14
    Would I be better of giving the NIC a dynamic IP?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •