Results 1 to 2 of 2
Yesterday I went to update my file server from RH9 to FC4. The hard drive had a 50G partition at the end, and in the setup I rearranged just about ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 11-28-2005 #1
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
Partition messed up.. looking for advise before I sfdisk
here is some sfdisk output
$ sfdisk -l -x -uS /dev/hda Device Boot Start End #sectors Id System /dev/hde1 * 63 208844 208782 83 Linux /dev/hde2 208845 20691719 20482875 83 Linux /dev/hde3 20691720 41174594 20482875 83 Linux /dev/hde4 41174595 156296384 115121790 f Win 95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/hde5 41174658 43214849 2040192 83 Linux - 43214850 45255104 2040255 5 Extended - 41174595 41174594 0 0 Empty - 41174595 41174594 0 0 Empty /dev/hde6 43214913 45255104 2040192 83 Linux - 45255105 47295359 2040255 5 Extended - 43214850 43214849 0 0 Empty - 43214850 43214849 0 0 Empty
So, First Q... on my healthy computer, the extended partition is type '5', and just called 'Extended', no mention of LBA. So, what the difference?
And I have a couple of solution ideas, let me know what you think. First, I was thinking of using sfdisk to change hde6 to be as big as the rest of the space. If I can at least get the drive to act normal, I can copy /dev/hde6 to somefile.dat. This file would be like 60 gigs big. The contents will be a couple of partitions garbled together, I know. But I can write a utility to find the beginging of an etx3 partition and then read out the file. With some luck, I can crop the somefile down to a trimmed file that represents just the original partition. (I am a software engineer. I don't know much about ext3, but I will learn if that's what it takes to recover this data), and then I can mount the file.
My concern is, does sfdisk just write in the partition space? I want to make sure that it doesn't write anywhere else in the data. I'm pretty sure it won't because that's what mkfs utilities should dov(I think), but I figure I better ask an expert.
Also, and maybe I should leave this alone, but I was thinking of changing the extended partition to be type '5'. Why, I don't know, but it seems to be the working type on my healthy pc. And would be consistent with the other partitions.
Any help, hints, advise on this are much appreciated.
- 12-02-2005 #2
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Berkshire, UK
I've never seen this partition type 5 used - any idea how the partitions got set up in the first place.
Also I've never seen these 'empty' lines.
I use fdisk, not sfdisk, since that's all there was when I started, and all my partitions are simple with no 'odd' lines. The 'empty' lines could be a display manifestation of sfdisk for displaying space which is a logical extension of a partition.
I add a listing of one of my HDDs to show what it looks like for fdisk:
Disk /dev/hda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 1 7 56196 83 Linux
/dev/hda2 * 8 454 3590527+ b W95 FAT32
/dev/hda3 455 977 4200997+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda4 978 14593 109370520 f W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hda5 978 1870 7172991 7 HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda6 1871 2131 2096451 b W95 FAT32
/dev/hda7 2132 4681 20482843+ b W95 FAT32
/dev/hda8 4682 7869 25607578+ b W95 FAT32
/dev/hda9 7870 11057 25607578+ b W95 FAT32
/dev/hda10 14000 14509 4096543+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda11 14510 14593 674698+ 82 Linux swap
I would have thought that your best bet might be to boot from a CD and do an fsck from there as first resort:
first just scan to see wht errors it show
then do a fix run and see how it turns out.
Have u tried System Rescue CD?