Results 1 to 1 of 1
After a partition resize my 500GB USB2 disk refuses to mount, disk was ext3 partition, gparted & qtparted now recognizes it as ext2
Code:
root@ubuntu:/#fsck -y /dev/sda1
giving me a ...
- 03-31-2007 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Posts
- 1
EXT3-fs: corrupt root inode after resize
After a partition resize my 500GB USB2 disk refuses to mount, disk was ext3 partition, gparted & qtparted now recognizes it as ext2
giving me a lot of "Group x's inode table at xxxxx conflicts with some other fs block." Relocate<y>? yes"Code:root@ubuntu:/#fsck -y /dev/sda1
until " Root inode is not a directory. Clear? yes " Aaaaargh, damn ......
error 8 popped up, but didn't halt process, left it running for 50 hours before quiting it.
it gave me also a couple of following mesages ( I included further a #dumpe2fs -h /dev/sda1 )
"Programming error? block #71663648 claimed for no reason in process_bad_block"
"Programming error? block #78676000 claimed for no reason in process_bad_block."
"Programming error? block #102400032 claimed for no reason in process_bad_block."
etc...
Code:root@ubuntu:/# mount /dev/sda1 /media/500gb/ mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda1, missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so
testdisk reveals EXT2 Large file Sparse superblock, 497 GB / 463 GiBCode:root@ubuntu:/# dmesg | tail [17179650.572000] Bluetooth: L2CAP ver 2.8 [17179650.572000] Bluetooth: L2CAP socket layer initialized [17179651.772000] Bluetooth: RFCOMM socket layer initialized [17179651.772000] Bluetooth: RFCOMM TTY layer initialized [17179651.772000] Bluetooth: RFCOMM ver 1.7 [17181754.432000] EXT2-fs: corrupt root inode, run e2fsck
gparted & qtparted are showing an ext2 partition
Code:root@ubuntu:/# lde /dev/sda1 User requested autodetect filesystem. Checking device . . . Found ext2fs on device. Warning: First block (0) != Normal first block (1) root inode isn't a directory
For sure there's a filesystem there....Code:root@ubuntu:/# dumpe2fs -h /dev/sda1 dumpe2fs 1.39 (29-May-2006) Filesystem volume name: <none> Last mounted on: <not available> Filesystem UUID: 0ef5a677-47fb-4bae-aee0-a25bc58bfd4a Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53 Filesystem revision #: 1 (dynamic) Filesystem features: resize_inode dir_index filetype sparse_super large_file Default mount options: (none) Filesystem state: not clean with errors Errors behavior: Continue Filesystem OS type: Linux Inode count: 60735488 Block count: 121453400 Reserved block count: 6072670 Free blocks: 10644662 Free inodes: 60563151 First block: 0 Block size: 4096 Fragment size: 4096 Reserved GDT blocks: 1024 Blocks per group: 32768 Fragments per group: 32768 Inodes per group: 16384 Inode blocks per group: 512 Filesystem created: Sat Feb 24 13:51:53 2007 Last mount time: Wed Mar 14 17:16:31 2007 Last write time: Wed Mar 14 17:30:45 2007 Mount count: 1 Maximum mount count: 29 Last checked: Wed Mar 14 16:31:47 2007 Check interval: 15552000 (6 months) Next check after: Mon Sep 10 17:31:47 2007 Reserved blocks uid: 0 (user root) Reserved blocks gid: 0 (group root) First inode: 11 Inode size: 128 Default directory hash: tea Directory Hash Seed: 25354299-dd40-40db-928a-47b1cd3bf8b6 Journal backup: inode blocks Bad blocks: 7962656, 11239456, 20480032, 23887904, 71663648, 78676000, 102400032 ( see first part of message )
started fsck again
again a lot of "Group x's inode table at xxxxx conflicts with some other fs block." Relocate<y>? yes"Code:#fsck -y /dev/sda1
and
"Programming error? block #71663648 claimed for no reason in process_bad_block"
"Programming error? block #78676000 claimed for no reason in process_bad_block."
"Programming error? block #102400032 claimed for no reason in process_bad_block."
currently it's still running ( 64 hours now, is this normal ? )
lde is probably able to correct this, but I thought it would be wise if one of the gurus out there would help me out on this.
Rlinux ( free application on http://www.data-recovery-software.ne...Recovery.shtml is able to recover about 70% of my data.
Nucleus Kernel Linux ( not free, 49$ http://www.nucleustechnologies.com/ ) is able to recover ALL of my data
any help is highly appreciated
Jan


Reply With Quote
