Results 1 to 4 of 4
I am about to install Linux and Windows XP on a partitioned hard drive (dedicated for these two OS’s only. The data and software apps will be on other drives). ...
- 02-09-2011 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 5
SATA verses IDE
I am about to install Linux and Windows XP on a partitioned hard drive (dedicated for these two OS’s only. The data and software apps will be on other drives). I have two choices for a drive, an 80 Gb IDE or an 80 Gb SATA drive. Are there any advantages to the SATA over the IDE on an Abit NS7 motherboard?
As a back up for the 80 Gb OS drive, can I ghost it to another 80 Gb drive? Can a SATA be ghosted to an IDE? Are there better options for backing up this drive?
Thanks
Missouri Mule
- 02-09-2011 #2
SATA is supposed to be faster, isn't it? I'd go with that.
You'll have to wait for someone else to answer the second question.I do not respond to private messages asking for Linux help, Please keep it on the forums only.
All new users please read this.** Forum FAQS. ** Adopt an unanswered post.
- 02-09-2011 #3forum.guy
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- arch linux
- Posts
- 18,086
Perhaps it won't happen, but I suspect that IDE drives will be dying off considerably in the near future. Solid state drives look to be the new wave and they seem to be going SATA for the most part.
Last edited by oz; 02-09-2011 at 11:09 PM. Reason: spell
oz
→ new members/users: read this first | new member faq
→ no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
→ please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.
- 02-10-2011 #4Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 110
There isn't much sense getting an IDE drive over a SATA one in 2011 unless you're using a really old 2.4 kernel or some other mix of hardware/software that doesn't support SATA.


Reply With Quote
