Results 1 to 3 of 3
Soo.. I decided to install Fedora the other night and OOooooh mumma am I having fun. Dual boot with Winxp, same drive, XP uses 2 partitions (one boot, one OS).
...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 04-07-2005 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 6
Fedora 3/winXP corrupted partition tables
Soo.. I decided to install Fedora the other night and OOooooh mumma am I having fun. Dual boot with Winxp, same drive, XP uses 2 partitions (one boot, one OS).
The first attempt went reasonably well up to the part where DD wouldn't let me create a swap, I had run out of primary partions and there was no extended partition to create a logical drive in (if DD even allows that??) so I got the thing going with no swap, and it was horribly slow. I figured it was the swap blunder, and started over. (In fact it was not the swap blunder, but some network issues I am pursuing elsewhere that may or may not include issues with IPV6 and tcp windows scaling etc).
The second attempt I got into XP and pulled out partition magic 8. I had an unused 50MB /boot for linux, a C: boot for windows (100MB), a 500MB unused SWAP for linux, an 8gig or so / for linux, and a 40gig or so windows OS partition. All was well, I blew away the partitions I did create with linux, did some resizing and came up with:
C: windows boot, big logical with a D: windows OS and room for a linux swap and /).
Back into linux.. created the 2 linux partitions, installed grub on the / partition, copied my linux.img over to windows and set up boot.ini for the bootloader (as per instructions on several pages), booted up linux and shazam.. no problemo. Things still dog slow (see earlier mention of unrelated network problems). Ok.. so far so good, but due to the wierdness I have to boot into windows to surf around looking for fixes.
Decided to run partition magic to see my handiwork and it said it was invalid HOLY MOLY here's what it showed in windows disk management:

Yikes.. it offered to resize automaticall and I decided to let it try, it now came up as INVALID. But disk management now showed:Code:=========================================================================================================== Partition Information for Disk 1: 58,643.5 Megabytes Volume PartType Status Size MB PartSect # StartSect TotalSects =========================================================================================================== C: NTFS Pri,Boot 329.4 0 0 63 674,667 ExtendedX Pri 58,314.1 0 1 674,730 119,427,210 EPBR Log 0.0 None -- 674,730 63 EPBR Log 9,154.2 674,730 0 674,731 18,747,854 Warning #113: EPBR partition starting at 674731 overlaps previous EPBR partition. Linux Ext3 Log 9,154.2 674,731 0 674,856 18,747,729 Info: Logical starting at 674856 is not one head away from EPBR. EPBR Log 509.9 674,731 1 19,422,585 1,044,225 *:SWAPSPACE2 Linux Swap Log 509.8 19,422,585 0 19,422,648 1,044,162 Unallocated Log 7.8 None -- 20,466,810 16,065 Error #113: Primary partition starting at 20482938 overlaps previous partition. D: NTFS Pri 48,642.1 0 2 20,482,938 99,619,002

Hey not shabby, much closer to what I thought should be there. I ran partition magic with an 'ignore partition errors' flag /IPE and it currently shows (although it considers this invalid):Code:=========================================================================================================== Partition Information for Disk 1: 58,643.5 Megabytes Volume PartType Status Size MB PartSect # StartSect TotalSects =========================================================================================================== C: NTFS Pri,Boot 329.4 0 0 63 674,667 ExtendedX Pri 9,672.0 0 1 674,730 19,808,208 EPBR Log 0.0 None -- 674,730 63 Warning #113: EPBR partition starting at 674731 overlaps previous EPBR partition. EPBR Log 9,154.2 674,730 1 674,731 18,747,854 Info: Logical starting at 674856 is not one head away from EPBR. Linux Ext3 Log 9,154.2 674,731 0 674,856 18,747,729 EPBR Log 509.9 674,731 1 19,422,585 1,044,225 *:SWAPSPACE2 Linux Swap Log 509.8 19,422,585 0 19,422,648 1,044,162 Unallocated Log 7.8 None -- 20,466,810 16,065 D: NTFS Pri 48,642.1 0 2 20,482,938 99,619,002

Despite all this manipulation it still boots both OS's fine from the windows bootloader. I am at a loss as to how to get rid of some of the wierdness with the EBPR entries that is obviously confusing things!
Any tips would be great!
- 04-07-2005 #2Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 6
ps forgot to include, I ran findpart and it shows the following:
Code:D:\Documents and Settings\Chad\Desktop\fpart463>findpart all Findpart, version 4.63 - for Windows 95/98/ME/NT/2000/XP. Copyright Svend Olaf Mikkelsen, 1999-2005. OS: Windows 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 All Disk: 1 Cylinders: 7476 Heads: 255 Sectors: 63 MB: 58643 -PCyl N ID -----Rel -----Num ---MB -Start CHS- --End CHS-- BS CHS 0 - 07 63 674667 329 0 1 1 41 254 63 B OK 0 - 83 674730 17398395 8495 42 0 1 1124 254 63 B5 3 OK 42 2 05 1 18747854 9154 42 0 2 1208*254 63 42 OK 1209 1 82 63 1044162 509 1209* 1 1 1273*254 63 OK 0 - 07 63 20482812 10001 0 1 1 1274 254 63 BU OK 1275 1 07 63 99619002 48642 1275* 1 1 7475*254 63 OK OK 1275 - 07 63 99602937 48634 1275 1 1 7474 254 63 BU OK -----FAT CHS -Size Cl --Root -Good -Rep. Maybe --Bad YYMMDD DataMB 1086 1 33 Second FAT not found. Partitions according to partition tables on first harddisk: -PCyl N ID -----Rel -----Num ---MB -Start CHS- --End CHS-- BS CHS 0 1*07 63 674667 329 0 1 1 41 254 63 OK OK 0 2 0F 674730 19808208 9671 42 0 1 1275* 0 63 OK 0 3 07 20482938 99619002 48642 1275* 1 1 7475*254 63 NB OK 42 2 05 1 18747854 9154 42 0 2 1208*254 63 OK 42+1 83 125 18747729 9154 42 2 1 1208*254 63 OK 3 OK 42+2 05 18747855 1044225 509 1209* 0 1 1273*254 63 OK 1209 1 82 63 1044162 509 1209* 1 1 1273*254 63 OK Disk: 2 Cylinders: 14593 Heads: 255 Sectors: 63 MB: 114470 --PCyl N ID -----Rel -----Num ---MB --Start CHS- ---End CHS-- BS CHS 0 - 07 63234420417114463 0 1 1 14591 254 63 B OK No FATs found. Partitions according to partition tables on second harddisk: --PCyl N ID -----Rel -----Num ---MB --Start CHS- ---End CHS-- BS CHS 0 1*07 63234420417114463 0 1 1 14591*254 63 OK OK
- 04-12-2005 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 6
Anybody here know how to fix this?


Reply With Quote
