Results 1 to 7 of 7
I have installed XP Pro and SuSE on the Seagate SATA 80 gig. On install it only allowed me to use NTFS. I have always been able to choose Fat ...
- 07-10-2005 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Talladega, AL
- Posts
- 83
SATA - NTFS only ??
I have installed XP Pro and SuSE on the Seagate SATA 80 gig. On install it only allowed me to use NTFS. I have always been able to choose Fat 32 or NTFS before.
Does anyone know why it will not allow it now? Is it the SATA?
Thanks
- 07-10-2005 #2
I highly doubt that the disk limits the filesystem, though, I always though XP could only be installed on NTFS
- 07-10-2005 #3NTFS or FAT32
Originally Posted by dylunio
~Mike ~~~ Forum Rules
Testing? What's that? If it compiles, it is good, if it boots up, it is perfect. ~ Linus Torvalds
http://loft306.org
- 07-10-2005 #4
"I always though XP could only be installed on NTFS"
You have the choice to format NTFS or FAT (FAT32).
http://www.petri.co.il/images/setup9.jpg
- 07-11-2005 #5Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Talladega, AL
- Posts
- 83
This is weird ...!!
Quote:
You have the choice to format NTFS or FAT (FAT32).
http://www.petri.co.il/images/setup9.jpg
I went to your jpeg, and that is what I have got before - when I loaded XP Pro on my 40 gig Seagate EIDE drive. I have installed this same XP Pro a number of times - and this is the first time I have not had the choice.
Weird!! I am just wondering if it is something to do with SATA ??
Thanks for the replies.
- 07-11-2005 #6
WinXP has a 32GB limit for formatting a FAT32 partition, this is why most people will use NTFS. You can format the complete disk using FAT32 if you use a Win9x bootdisk (fdisk, reboot, and then format).
http://support.microsoft.com/default...;EN-US;q314463
- 07-11-2005 #7Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Talladega, AL
- Posts
- 83
Ahhh - I see.
That is why. I have an 80 gig.
Then I should be able to partition the drive into smaller partitions and use FAT 32 - right?
If that is a yes - what might be the best scenario for having a portion or more set to FAT 32 to work well with Linux?
Thanks for the help.


Reply With Quote
