Results 1 to 8 of 8
Hello
I have upgraded my CPU, and tried to install Red hat9 on it. But it displayed me a message the the hard drives could not be deteted and installation ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 02-09-2007 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 41
hard disk not detected
Hello
I have upgraded my CPU, and tried to install Red hat9 on it. But it displayed me a message the the hard drives could not be deteted and installation can not be continued.
I even tried with FC3 , but it got stuck in a more recent stage detecting APCI and PCI Bus 0 and did not moved further.
Same was the case with ubuntu.
My configuration is as under.
Hard Drive:Hitachi HDS721616PLA380
Motherboard :Intel D946GZIS with Pentium D processor
Shud I download the new version of Linux?
I was able to install both red hat and fedora on my earlier configuration but not able to ..now
Pls help
- 02-09-2007 #2Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 110
Well you did't tell us that you have switched from a Pata disk to a Sata disk but we still tell you that older distros like RH9 and FC3 donot support Sata.
Try FC6 as I got it inside a Sata.
- 02-09-2007 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 41
i dont get you.....
I have a pata disk.......so does that mean FC6 will also be of no use?
- 02-09-2007 #4Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 110
According to the Internet information your disk "Hitachi HDS721616PLA380" is a 160Gb Sata.
RH9 and FC3 will not recognise it.
If you have a Pata too then both distros can see the Pata, but you have already confirmed having been able to install distros into the old disk.
So which part you doesn't get?
- 02-09-2007 #5Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 41
this one is also availabe as pata..the one i am having
initially i was not having a pata disk.....when both distros cud b successfully installed on to my comp.
I have changed my HD too while upgrading...and now i have one single 160 Gb pata disk.... so what do u suggest now...as it cud not detect my Hitachi pata disk
- 02-09-2007 #6Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 110
You have to come clean on this one because you put the disk in right? Nobody know better than you.
You must know that the new 160Gb disk is a Pata or a Sata because you bought it yourself.
The Internet information seems to suggest it is a Sata but you keep saying it is a Pata.
Did you use the same ribbon cable to connect the current disk?
- 02-10-2007 #7Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 41
yeah sorry... u r right...i have chkd ..i have sata .
SO u think...i shud dwnld FC6
- 02-10-2007 #8Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 110
It is your personal choice.
Most recent distros can be installed and booted from a Sata.
You are playing with RH9 which is the last free Red Hat available. Fedora succeds Red Hat and is now version 6 but you are still hanging on to FC3. I believe you can get RH9 and FC3 to recognise Sata if you are prepared to compile a new kernel with the Sata support built into it. For my money I find it more expedient to work with a more mordern distro because there are other hardware issues too.


Reply With Quote
