Welcome to Linux Forums!

With a comprehensive Linux Forum, information on various types of Linux software and many Linux Reviews articles, we have all the knowledge you need a click away, or accessible via our knowledgeable members.

Linux Forum ArticlesLinux ForumsLinux Forum DownloadsLinux Hosts
Home|Register|FAQ|Member List|Calendar|Unanswered Posts|Forum Rules|Today's Posts|Advanced Search|
SEARCH FOR IN
Go Back   Linux Forums > Linux Resources > LinuxForums.org - Articles
Reload this Page Linux vs. Windows Viruses
Linux Forums
Linux Forums
Welcome To The Linux Forums!
Welcome to Linux Forums. We pride ourselves in being one of the largest Linux communities on the web, we encourage you to REGISTER on our forums and participate in the community. There are over 150,000 members ready to answer your questions. JOINING US today will allow you to make new posts, get support, send messages to other members and submit downloads to our downloads directory and many other great features!

LinuxForums.org - Articles Linux Forums Articles Archive.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-06-2003   #1 (permalink)
jasonlambert
Linux Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,284
Linux vs. Windows Viruses

Full Article: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/33226.html

Quote:
Opinion To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it, writes SecurityFocus columnist Scott Granneman.

We've all heard it many times when a new Microsoft virus comes out. In fact, I've heard it a couple of times this week already. Someone on a mailing list or discussion forum complains about the latest in a long line of Microsoft email viruses or worms and recommends others consider Mac OS X or Linux as a somewhat safer computing platform. In response, another person named, oh, let's call him "Bill," says, basically, "How ridiculous! The only reason Microsoft software is the target of so many viruses is because it is so widely used! Why, if Linux or Mac OS X was as popular as Windows, there would be just as many viruses written for those platforms!"


A pretty interesting article i thought, but the author seems to be a little confused about what "Social Engineering" is.


Jason
jasonlambert is offline  
Old 10-06-2003   #2 (permalink)
fingal
Linux Guru
 
fingal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Birmingham - UK
Posts: 1,529
Interesting article! He does seem a bit mixed up about the whole 'social engineering' thing. I believe Kevin Mitnick and his girlfriend coined the phrase? This seemed to involve conning people out of passwords over the phone, or just manipulating people in general in order to gain access to secure systems.
__________________
I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
fingal is offline  
Old 10-06-2003   #3 (permalink)
jasonlambert
Linux Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,284
Social Engineering is basically about manipulating people. I can promise you it has F**k All to do with Outlook Express automatically executing files

The authors statement: "Poorly designed software makes it easier for social engineering to take place" is totally incorrect.
jasonlambert is offline  
Old 10-06-2003   #4 (permalink)
sarumont
Content Team Leader
 
sarumont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: /dev/urandom
Posts: 3,662
From Mitnick's book:

Quote:
Social engineering uses influence and persuasion to deceive people by convincing them that the social engineer is someone he is not, or by manipulation. As a result, the social engineer is able to take advantage of people to obtain information with or without the use of technology.
sarumont is offline  
Old 10-06-2003   #5 (permalink)
flw
Linux Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,025
Quote:
Mitnick's book
When every I read his name I cringe He's nothing more that a entry level social engineer with intermediate VMS and cell preak skill sets that got lots of publicity and some jail time. This is assumed as proof of his skill level accross the board.

Infact, he was indeed a scape goat with a basic skill set in social engineering and has been looking to take advantage of his name recognition by his P.O.S. book (Over priced unless used at 1/3 to 1/4 the full cost) , radio talk show (canceled BTW) and his (company ) offering misc. security services.
__________________
Dan

\"Keep your friends close and your enemies even closer\" from The Art of War by Sun Tzu\"
flw is offline  
Old 10-06-2003   #6 (permalink)
e_dreamer
Just Joined!
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaguar
Social Engineering is basically about manipulating people. I can promise you it has F**k All to do with Outlook Express automatically executing files

The authors statement: "Poorly designed software makes it easier for social engineering to take place" is totally incorrect.
sorry, but i can't really agree mate.
if it didn't execute the files automaticly, then people whould have to be maniuplated into doing it for themselves... which would require more social engineering so to speak.
it's easier for me to persuade you to walk into a room, than it is for me persuade you to walk into a room and open a sucpicious looking box. if you get my meaning.
__________________
we\'ll smoke the monster out!
e_dreamer is offline  
Old 10-06-2003   #7 (permalink)
jasonlambert
Linux Guru
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 3,284
IIRC you had to click on the email subject to get the option to delete it. I understand where you are coming from though.
jasonlambert is offline  
Old 10-06-2003   #8 (permalink)
flw
Linux Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,025
Quote:
if it didn't execute the files automaticly, then people whould have to be maniuplated into doing it for themselves...
All types of methods of infection require user action, it just depends on how much and the exceptance of inaction is action none the less.

Traditionally click on a file from floppy or hard drive, file attachment from email or have the option on (on by defualt but the user chooses by decision or ignorce to leave it on rather that view as text only) for previewing messsages which then initiates the infection. All require the user to do something.

My point is that all virus's requre user action or lack of, but still chosen by the user still. So it does require some action, at some point in the process, OS or app setup etc....

Just like you chose to or not to, get a current AV and keep it up to date etc...

My 2 cents,
__________________
Dan

\"Keep your friends close and your enemies even closer\" from The Art of War by Sun Tzu\"
flw is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 12:38 AM.




© 2000 - 2008 - All Rights Reserved - Property of  MAS Media

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0