Results 1 to 5 of 5
hhhmmmmm this is wierd, i installedmandriva and the games that come with it barely run. its soooo jerky. i was under the impression it would at least run them. i ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 11-30-2005 #1
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
sooo crap with graphics?
i seen doom for linux and there would be no way of it running when a silly little game doesnt work..
what am i doing wrong?
my specs are:
amd 3200 64bit
512mb dual channel
20gig maxtor hdd
- 11-30-2005 #2Originally Posted by garylouden
Next time, it would be better to get a nvidia card.
Also note:: I don't have an ati card so I have no experience installing its drivers etc...Life is complex, it has a real part and an imaginary part.
- 11-30-2005 #3Originally Posted by AlexKNothing is worse than ten penguins fighting over which is better, vi or emacs.
Registered Linux User #404402
Finally I'm back on LF after a long while.
- 12-01-2005 #4
I am using an ati radeon x300 on my mandriva box and it works great! i have been doing so much tweaking with this new box i can't remember, but i believe i was offered the choice upon install of Mandriva 2006.0 and it has worked flawlessly.- Clouds don't crash - Bertrand Meyer
registered Linux user 393557
finally - hw to brag about - but next year it will look pitifully quaint:
Athlon64 X2 3800 - 1G PC3200 - 250G SATA - ati radeon x300
- 12-01-2005 #5
Yep, I confirm.
Easy install, easy 3D, those ATI drivers are getting better and better.
This what I get out of my el-cheapo Radeon 9550:
mastah@hugues:~/bertha/Hugues/LINUX/DEBIAN$ glxgears 8067 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1613.400 FPS 9889 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1977.800 FPS 9885 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1977.000 FPS 9812 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1962.400 FPS 9893 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1978.600 FPS 9890 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1978.000 FPS"To express yourself in freedom, you must die to everything of yesterday. From the 'old', you derive security; from the 'new', you gain the flow."