Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 15 of 15
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
  1. #11
    Linux Engineer
    Join Date
    Nov 2004

    Quote Originally Posted by ozar View Post
    I'm afraid this machine might be too minimal for just about any version of Linux.
    Nonsense! I built LFS on a 486!
    With the right bit of tweaking and not expecting too much, that could be a great box for simple uses.
    I highly reccomend NOT using X on that system though.

  2. #12
    SuperMod (Back again) devils casper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Chandigarh, India
    There are a lot of lightweight Windows Managers available like fvwm, fluxbox etc. You should try one of those.
    It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit.
    New Users: Read This First

  3. #13
    Thank you for all your help everyone. I have managed to get a version of Damn Small Linux running. It is quite slow and freezes when u try to open two things at once, but it is much better than the useless Windows 98 I had running.

  4. $spacer_open
  5. #14
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Middle of No Where.
    I would suggest the server edition of DSL, and then putting wmii or openbox on it. LFS might also work. But it will take some time to set up. Also, you might want to upgrade your ram to something like 128mb. The upgrade will be cheap, but should get your ram to the point where you can install a linux with some real features in it.

  6. #15
    Thankyou for reply Remix_Eyeballs but I'm afraid upgrade of ram to 128MB will not be possible. It will not be cheap, in fact it actually will be very expensive and I already have DSL running quite well on it. Also, I'm going to try to get slackware 9.1 to work on it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts