Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 7 of 7
I am fairly new to linux and would like to know the legality of the wget command. i would like to download a site as a template. changing all of ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
  1. #1
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1

    Question Wget


    I am fairly new to linux and would like to know the legality of the wget command. i would like to download a site as a template. changing all of the info but keeping the structure. is the downloading of a site with no malicious intent legal?

    thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    Blackfooted Penguin daark.child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    West Yorks
    Posts
    4,393
    I think your question is to do with copyright and legal issues rather that wget. Some websites are copyrighted, so if you are found to be using their images, content, template etc without the owners consent, you could be done for copyright infringement depending on the laws of your country.

  3. #3
    Linux Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Córdoba (Spain)
    Posts
    1,513
    Copyrighted material can't be used without permissions, that's not wget's problem.

    However, downloading it is not ilegal, since, in first place, to view a site implies that you are downloading it, in one or another way. There's no magical way you can view a site without downloading it's contents. That'd be the informatic version of telepathy.

  4. #4
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by daark.child View Post
    I think your question is to do with copyright and legal issues rather that wget. Some websites are copyrighted, so if you are found to be using their images, content, template etc without the owners consent, you could be done for copyright infringement depending on the laws of your country.
    According to the legislation in some countries (e.g. Finland), all website designs are copyrighted, even if you cannot find an explicit (c) there. So it all depends on your local legislation.

    Don't assume, that we all live in the same country...

    mikko

  5. #5
    Blackfooted Penguin daark.child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    West Yorks
    Posts
    4,393
    Quote Originally Posted by MikJP View Post
    According to the legislation in some countries (e.g. Finland), all website designs are copyrighted, even if you cannot find an explicit (c) there. So it all depends on your local legislation.

    Don't assume, that we all live in the same country...

    mikko
    I'm not sure if the last line was part of the response to my post. If it was, then I'd like to clarify that I wasn't making any assumptions that everyone lives in the same country. This is why I specifically mentioned that the consequences of copying designs and content depend on the country where an individual is located. Also note that just because something is copyrighted somewhere it does not mean that the copyright is valid in all countries.

  6. #6
    Linux Guru bigtomrodney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    6,132
    There's also the matter that trawling a website for offline browsing is often considered bad form and against the terms and conditions of usage in some cases.

    There used to be a lot of website mirroring tools but I think these are less useful now with the dynamic content that we see these days.

  7. #7
    Linux Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Córdoba (Spain)
    Posts
    1,513
    Quote Originally Posted by MikJP View Post
    According to the legislation in some countries (e.g. Finland), all website designs are copyrighted, even if you cannot find an explicit (c) there. So it all depends on your local legislation.

    Don't assume, that we all live in the same country...

    mikko
    I don't think anyone assumed such a thing. I don't live in the USA either, if that's what you mean :P

    However, as I said on my other post, downloading a site could hardly be considered illegal, since that's what the browser does when you write the url and press enter. That the client is called wget instead of IE or mozilla-firefox is not something that could be sustained on a tribunal, I guess.

    As the other person above said, it's not the fact of downloading it, it's HOW you use that contents afterwards. In that respect, yes, check the legality in your country (and the country where it's hosted the site, since international relationships sometimes define agreements to handle www issues).

    That being said, I am not a lawyer, so maybe there's something I am not considering...

    Cheers and have a nice sunday

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •