Results 1 to 5 of 5
Hi, I am trying to assemble a partially-grown RAID5 array (I interrupted the growing process on purpose, to ensure I can recover data if something interrupts growing the array on ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 12-16-2008 #1
mdadm, assembling array after interrupt during growing
I am trying to assemble a partially-grown RAID5 array (I interrupted the growing process on purpose, to ensure I can recover data if something interrupts growing the array on which I keep my real data).
The OS is Fedora 10. The array was created using anaconda, during the installation. It consisted of sda2, sdb2, sdc2. /boot is on /dev/sda1 and sd[bcd]1 don't matter.
[root@f10-raid ~]# cat /etc/mdadm.conf # mdadm.conf written out by anaconda DEVICE partitions MAILADDR root ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid5 num-devices=3 metadata=0.90 spares=1 UUID=7ba24636:261b5ba5:d6f453eb:dfc5afa4 [root@f10-raid ~]# mdadm --detail /dev/md0 /dev/md0: Version : 0.90 Creation Time : Sun Dec 14 15:01:47 2008 Raid Level : raid5 Array Size : 8176640 (7.80 GiB 8.37 GB) Used Dev Size : 4088320 (3.90 GiB 4.19 GB) Raid Devices : 3 Total Devices : 3 Preferred Minor : 0 Persistence : Superblock is persistent Update Time : Tue Dec 16 21:54:43 2008 State : clean Active Devices : 3 Working Devices : 3 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0 Layout : left-symmetric Chunk Size : 256K UUID : 7ba24636:261b5ba5:d6f453eb:dfc5afa4 Events : 0.880 Number Major Minor RaidDevice State 0 8 2 0 active sync /dev/sda2 1 8 18 1 active sync /dev/sdb2 2 8 34 2 active sync /dev/sdc2
It worked perfectly, then I added sdd2 to md0 and started growing it:
mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdf1 mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --raid-devices=4
mdadm: no devices found for /dev/md0 Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while... Volume group "VolGroup00" not found Unable to access resume device /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol01 mount: error mounting /dev/root on /sysroot as ext3: No such file or directoryCode:
# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 mdadm: no devices found for /dev/md0 # mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdc2 /dev/sdd2 mdadm: no devices found for /dev/md0 # mdadm --examine /dev/md0 mdadm: No md superblock detected on /dev/md0 # mdadm --examine /dev/sda2 #the same for sdb2/sdc2/sdd2 /dev/sda2: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 0.91.00 UUID : 7ba24636:261b5ba5:d6f453eb:dfc5afa4 Creation Time : Sun Dec 14 14:01:47 2008 Raid Level : raid5 Used Dev Size : 4088320 (3.90 GiB 4.19 GB) Array Size : 12264960 (11.70 GiB 12.56 GB) Raid Devices : 4 Total Devices : 4 Preferred Minor : 0 Reshape pos'n : 123648 (120.77 MiB 126.62 MB) Delta Devices : 1 (3->4) Update Time : Tue Dec 16 21:02:24 2008 State : active Active Devices : 4 Working Devices : 4 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0 Checksum : 947a4a69 - correct Events : 927 Layout : left-symmetric Chunk Size : 256K Number Major Minor RaidDevice State this 0 8 2 0 active sync /dev/sda2 0 0 8 2 0 active sync /dev/sda2 1 1 8 18 1 active sync /dev/sdb2 2 2 8 34 2 active sync /dev/sdc2 3 3 8 50 3 active sync /dev/sdd2 # mdadm --grow --raid-disks=4 /dev/md0 mdadm: /dev/md0 is not an active md array - aborting
- 04-01-2009 #2
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
how did you get on ... I have a similar problem
- 04-02-2009 #3
Unfortunately, I didn't
I'm still using RAID0 with some backups and I'm afraid of moving to an array I can't rely on (because I have no idea how to fix it when something goes wrong).
- 01-02-2010 #4
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- 01-02-2010 #5
It's over one year old, but I guess it's indeed a typo in the --add line (it typed some of the commands here manually, not copied it from terminal).
I moved to another city and only have a laptop here, so setting up RAID doesn't have much sense other than for testing purposes, but still I'd like to try RAID again when I have some free time.
Anyway, thanks for the answer!