Results 1 to 10 of 12
I would like to build a linux storage server, using ide drives, raid and allow for windows clients to backup their files.
any ideas where to start or a particular ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 05-08-2003 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- chicago
- Posts
- 41
linux as a storage server
I would like to build a linux storage server, using ide drives, raid and allow for windows clients to backup their files.
any ideas where to start or a particular config?
thanks
- 05-08-2003 #2Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- Texas
- Posts
- 242
Build the server using hardware-based RAID.
Slap on Linux and Samba and you are ready.
That is what we use for network file sharing.
Works like a charm. I have no complaints.
- 05-08-2003 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- chicago
- Posts
- 41
hardware based raid
you got any ideas on the cost for a ide raid card. remember it needs to be IDE.
- 05-08-2003 #4Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- Texas
- Posts
- 242
I imagine an IDE RAID card could be $150 or less.
But we use only SCSI RAID around here, so I am
not sure which controllers Linux might support with
minimal intervention. You might search around for
a hardware compatibility FAQ to see if they give a
list of compatible IDE RAID controllers.
- 05-08-2003 #5Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Täby, Sweden
- Posts
- 7,578
You could also just put in a few IDE HDs and RAID them together in a software RAID array. See the Software-RAID-HOWTO on tldp.org for info on that.
- 05-09-2003 #6Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- Sweden
- Posts
- 796
I would suggest that NOT use a software RAID, hardware raid is much better and easier to administrate. Just pull a disk and put in a blank and its done. Use raid 1 or 5...
Regards
Regards
Andutt
- 05-09-2003 #7Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Täby, Sweden
- Posts
- 7,578
True, but software RAID is much cheaper.
- 05-09-2003 #8Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- Sweden
- Posts
- 796
Also true... but i think it is worth the money, save money or dataloss?
regards
Regards
Andutt
- 05-09-2003 #9Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Täby, Sweden
- Posts
- 7,578
I can't say that software RAID is that bad. If you're using a normal IDE contoller, than sure, the system may hang or otherwise crash if a hard drive crashes, but at least if you're using ext3, I wouldn't say that there's any risk of data loss, right?
- 05-09-2003 #10Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- Sweden
- Posts
- 796
True.... ext3 has a good repetition and i have never bumbed in to trouble using it, but when you look at the changelogs on the new kernels you get a little scared, it have been a bunch of really critical fixes in every one of them... so somebody have had problems i guess.
Software RAID is good but its not half as good as hardware raid at least i think so, i havent used it so much on linux, but on unix it was a pain in the **, if a disk went bad you had to remove the software raid, put in the new disk and configure software raid again... a bunch of administration is what it is...but better then nothing..
Regards
Regards
Andutt


Reply With Quote
