Results 1 to 10 of 16
Hi everyone. I want to format my old windows partition, where XP is installed.
I want to make it ext2 format and put it as another disk for linux, so ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 12-05-2004 #1
Formatting partition
Hi everyone. I want to format my old windows partition, where XP is installed.
I want to make it ext2 format and put it as another disk for linux, so i can read and write to it easily and freely. Is this possible? I googled it but the only thing i found out is that writing to ntfs file systems is a bit dangerous.
Thanks guys!!!
- 12-05-2004 #2Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 17
If you just want to wipe Windows, it is easy enough.
As root:
mkfs.ext2 /dev/hdXX
Change the XX to whatever drive it happens to be. Make sure you've got it right or else bad things will happen.
Once that is done, you'll have a nice drive to use for extra storage. To have it mount automatically, just put a line in /etc/fstab like so:
/dev/hdXX /mnt/backup ext2 defaults 0 0
You'll have to creat the mount directory of course.
Good luck. Might want to man mkfs to get a feel for the options and such. Any reason why you want ext2 instead of ext3?
- 12-05-2004 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- A world without walls or fences...
- Posts
- 47
hrm... my question also... if Windows was installed on it, it's prollly a pretty big partition, so I would think ext3 or reiser or some other journaling file system would be better
Originally Posted by Optimistic
- 12-05-2004 #4IIRC, the benchmarks find that ext2 is a tad faster than ext3
Originally Posted by Optimistic
as n0tt00elite says I would use reiserfs
- 12-05-2004 #5
The partition size is 29 Gb, maybe this will help you decide whether to have ext2, ext3 or the other one (i've never heard of that one before ).
- 12-06-2004 #6ext2 is the "standard" linux file system.
Originally Posted by sheds
ext3 is ext2 with a journal. what the journal does, is if there is a system crash (or power outage) when the hardrives is working, it will save time when the hard drive recovers afterwards. If you have ext2, and there is a crash, it will take a while (maybe 10 min) to get done checking. However, with ext3 it may only be like 30 sec
reiser (http://www.namesys.com/) is a "new" file system that has a better journal and is faster. I can tell a speed increase from ext2 to reiser.
I would go with reiser, unless you want to be able to write to the drive from windows, in which case ext2 is your only choice.
tons more info http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue55/florido.html
- 12-06-2004 #7
Thanks man. Lot's of help.
I'm gonna try that just now!!
- 12-06-2004 #8Like "mkdir backup", in this example, in mnt, right?
Originally Posted by Optimistic
Not really, i am just more familiar with ext2 than ext3, in which case, i guess i just change mkfs.ext2 for mkfs.ext3, or not?
Originally Posted by Optimistic 
Doesn't matter now. I just formatted following these exact steps:
1. mkfs.ext3 /dev/hdc1
2. Added this line to etc/fstab: /dev/hdc1 /mnt/backup ext3 defaults 0 0
3. cd'd to mnt/ and typed: mkdir backup
4. Typed mount dev/hdc1 mnt/backup
The fourth step error comes up like this: mount: mount point mnt/backup does not exist
Strange, cause i just created the directory. HELP PLEASE!!!
Please don't tell me i just sent 29 Gb of good storage space to hell.
- 12-07-2004 #9Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 17
It sounds like the folder didn't get created. Cd to the /mnt directroy and make sure there is a backup folder by issuing ls.The fourth step error comes up like this: mount: mount point mnt/backup does not exist
If that doesn't work try to mount the drive to a folder that you know exists--that way you can tell that there is no problem with the partition itself.
mount /dev/hdX /home/folder
Just to see...
ext3 is quickly becoming the standard because it is faster and mature enough to be stable, so I would go with ext3. I also like reiserFS.
- 12-07-2004 #10Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- A world without walls or fences...
- Posts
- 47
ReiserFS is actually pretty stable, isn't it? (not arguing, just asking. sometimes my questions come across as arguing) Is ext3 that much more stable? and how about speed? I (think that I) know that Gentoo uses Reiser, so...
Originally Posted by Optimistic


Reply With Quote
