Results 11 to 15 of 15
ya, gentoo is a very good choice. itsonly real difference from lfs is that its all set up to start installing rather than you having to obtain the files yourself. ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
| |
- 02-21-2005 #11Linux User
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- jacksonville beach FL
- Posts
- 317
ya, gentoo is a very good choice. itsonly real difference from lfs is that its all set up to start installing rather than you having to obtain the files yourself. also portage is realy powerfull and almost anyone that gets it installed loves it.
nVidia G-Force 6600GT (bfg) pci-e: amd 64 2000+ (939): 1024 corsair ram: 2X 80gb seagate harddisk SATA: plextor cd/dvd-read/write cdrom SATA
- 02-21-2005 #12Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 131
A word of warning LFS can be hard work but it is well worth it. Your unsserstanding of linux will greatly increase because of it
- 07-08-2006 #13Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Posts
- 185
Check out Vector Linux. I've been running Vector Linux 5.1.1 SOHO on my 900MHz machine for quite some time now. It really doesn't get much faster than this, and I love its Slackware foundation but with more newbie friendliness than pure Slackware.
www.vectorlinux.com
DrCR
- 07-08-2006 #14Linux User
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 421
How about optimizing your distro before trying another one? Fedora CAN be fast, if you are willing to put some extra effort into it. If you are not interested in that, then I'd second to use Arch. Not slower than LFS or Gentoo and easier to set up.
Windows free since 2002 | computing since 1984
- 07-09-2006 #15Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Texas
- Posts
- 9,496
This thread is over a year old and I don't see any more usefulness coming out of it. Locked.
Registered Linux user #270181
TechieMoe's Tech Rants
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
