Results 1 to 10 of 13
Is there a way to get a plain version linux without a distro attached to it...
- 03-06-2005 #1Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 577
Plain Linux
Is there a way to get a plain version linux without a distro attached to it
- 03-06-2005 #2
Re: Plain Linux
Linux from Scratch
Originally Posted by Dude500 Registered Linux user #270181
TechieMoe's Tech Rants
- 03-06-2005 #3Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Ft. Polk, LA
- Posts
- 796
Instead of that link you should use the more recent book found at http://linuxfromscratch.org
- 03-07-2005 #4Fine, fine. So my Google search wasn't good enough for you, eh valan?
Originally Posted by valan
Registered Linux user #270181
TechieMoe's Tech Rants
- 03-07-2005 #5Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Ft. Polk, LA
- Posts
- 796
nope
Originally Posted by techieMoe
- 03-07-2005 #6
You can get Linux with no distro from www.kernel.org
- 03-09-2005 #7Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 577
Thanks for the help
- 03-11-2005 #8Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 239
Sorry if this is a stupid question,
but what would you actually get if you just ran the bare kernel? Obviously things like gnome and KDE wont be there, but how much extra do apps like that add.
With the kernel would you still have networking etc available? Im imagining it just beeing the CLI, is that right?
- 03-11-2005 #9
no the bare kernel has no interface at the point. you first need a init program and a shell to execute commands against the kernel. then programs that you execute in the shell. when you type ls to read directories you are executing a program in shell that gets ran against the kernel. so you see it is more complicated than just the kernel.
- 03-11-2005 #10
Of course, you can GET a plain version with no distro at http://www.kernel.org/
Without some other software on top of it, however, it does precious little good.There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence.
- Jeremy S. Anderson


Reply With Quote