Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Here is the situation... I have two HP workstations that are PA-RISC based. The only os' that can run on them are Gentoo, Debian, and HP-UX. HP-UX is out the ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
  1. #1
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Union, SC
    Posts
    34

    Gentoo or Debian??


    Here is the situation... I have two HP workstations that are PA-RISC based. The only os' that can run on them are Gentoo, Debian, and HP-UX. HP-UX is out the window since it is not free.I am wondering out of Debian or Gentoo, which one would be more benifical for me to install? Also I was wondering about a VERY lightweight windowmanager to use since the systems have 96 Mb ram and slow processors. (50 Mhz RISC but runs faster then P233MMX.)

  2. #2
    Linux Guru bryansmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    /Ontario/Canada
    Posts
    2,619
    Hi nwoods29321,

    I don't know anything about HP workstations but I know a bit about Gentoo and Debian. This is what I think: Gentoo (after installing) might run faster because it would be compiled specifically for each workstation but the compiling during install and getting new packages through portage will take quite a while. Debian will not be built perfectly for your workstations but getting new programs and updates will be quicker because nothing will have to be compiled as packages are pre-compiled.

    In the end, it comes down to whether you want speed but long waits for updates and new packages or if you want a generic build but with shorter wait times for packages and updates.

    Bryan
    Looking for a distro? Look here.
    "There can be no doubt that all our knowledge begins with experience." - Immanuel Kant (Critique of Pure Reason)
    Queen's University - Arts and Science 2008 (Sociology)
    Registered Linux User #386147.

  3. #3
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Union, SC
    Posts
    34

    Thanks

    wait times are no problem. Debian is currently on one of the workstations and I have compiled a few programs onit. I went fairly fast. The workstations are mainly used for and designed for CAD/CAM and software development. Like I said, the processor is only 50 Mhz but runs faster then a P233MMX (Compared myself with old sys before mobo crashed.) So speed is my main issue. Which means it looks like I will be switching to Gentoo.

  4. $spacer_open
    $spacer_close
  5. #4
    Linux Engineer
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,431
    Debian Woody would probably be more stable than gentoo (don't flame me, I am a gentoo-fan!), since the packages get more testet before beeing let out on APT stable.

  6. #5
    Linux Guru bryansmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    /Ontario/Canada
    Posts
    2,619
    Like jaboua said, Debian's packages in the stable APT repository will have been tested thorougly and therefore may work better for what you are doing. So, since wait times are not an issue for you, it comes down to tested stability (Debian Stable) or more bleeding edge software (Gentoo). Then again, you can get testing and unstable versions of Debian as well.

    Bryan
    Looking for a distro? Look here.
    "There can be no doubt that all our knowledge begins with experience." - Immanuel Kant (Critique of Pure Reason)
    Queen's University - Arts and Science 2008 (Sociology)
    Registered Linux User #386147.

  7. #6
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Union, SC
    Posts
    34

    Hmmmm

    I gues I will continue to try out debian on 1 and try gentoo on the other.
    From the sounds of things, I may even tryout gentoo on this system as well. (See signature)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •