Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Hi all, This has probably been covered a thousand times already, BUT I'm new and didn't see it here. Are there any compelling reasons to go to 9? Or any ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
  1. #1
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    wollongong-ish
    Posts
    3

    RH 7.2 vs RH9


    Hi all,

    This has probably been covered a thousand times already, BUT I'm new and didn't see it here.

    Are there any compelling reasons to go to 9? Or any not to? We've got a program that runs on 7.2, but i'm a little concerned that we are going to run into compatibility problems with later hardware and such, we've struck a couple already with nforce chipsets and a seeming incompatibilty with grub.

    Before you ask, this isn't really my field, my linux knowledge is very limited, so don't give me to much s**t if I've said something dumb

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Linux Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Täby, Sweden
    Posts
    7,578
    That completely depends on what kind of program it is. Most core libraries retain compatibility between releases, but not all, and especially not rarely used auxiliary libraries.

    In general, RH9 is newer than 7.2, so it has more bugfixes and less vulnerabilities.

  3. #3
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    wollongong-ish
    Posts
    3
    its mainly a concern over the maturity of apache 2. They're 2.0.47 I think now aren't they? Is that far enough, or should we wait until 2.1 or something?

    Boy don't i sound lIke a newbie! I hate it haha

  4. $spacer_open
    $spacer_close
  5. #4
    Linux Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Täby, Sweden
    Posts
    7,578
    Oh, Apache 2 is mature. Rest firmly assured thereof.

  6. #5
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    wollongong-ish
    Posts
    3
    Is it?
    I should get you to convince our programmer of this!
    lol

    thanks

  7. #6
    Linux Engineer
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    1,319
    How is security in Red Hat? It seems like new releases are released too fast in my opinion but as long as it's stable and secure, I don't see a reason why version 9 would be bad. Spending about 7 months on 7.2, I can say that I really despised it.
    The best things in life are free.

  8. #7
    Linux User
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Hong Kong, China
    Posts
    256
    One of my cousins said that RH7.3 is better as a server, he said that ASP is better supported in rh7.3's apache 1.3.28. I have no idea about it.

    For me I prefer RH9.0 since it supports more hardwares.
    Signature removed by moderator - please see forum rules

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •