Results 1 to 8 of 8
i have done the following:
made 3 2GB Non DOS partitions, which i did the following to:
installed "/" directory of linux on one
installed "/boot" directory of linux onto ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 02-07-2003 #1Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Swansea (UK)
- Posts
- 221
Dual Boot done, bootloader problem
i have done the following:
made 3 2GB Non DOS partitions, which i did the following to:
installed "/" directory of linux on one
installed "/boot" directory of linux onto another
and installed "/home" directory of linux on the other
then
Made one FAT32 12GB partition which i installed windows 2000 onto, i set the partition with LILO on it to the active partition so that the boot loader would execute upon startup, but:
when i boot my computer it says "error loading operating system"#
i thought i could use the FAT32 partition and place a boot loader on that and boot using that partition then, i hear it can be done with "boot.ini", how and are there any other methods ?
THANKZ
- 02-08-2003 #2Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Täby, Sweden
- Posts
- 7,578
/boot does absolutely not need to 2GB! It doesn't even need to be 100 MB. That's an utter waste of space.
Anyway, I don't really understand this concept of an "active" partition that you're using... Exactly where did you install LILO?
- 02-08-2003 #3Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Swansea (UK)
- Posts
- 221
yeh i know now, i have allocated 94mb to it now, this post
NEEDS NO MORE REPLIES....... i think i've done it
- 02-11-2003 #4Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Posts
- 38
why dont u install windows first , then install Red Hat,.
After that when u u get into the red hat, copy file in the /boot . Then put it in the C:\...Also add a boot record in boot.ini file.
- 02-11-2003 #5Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Täby, Sweden
- Posts
- 7,578
therock: What are you talking about?!
- 02-11-2003 #6Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Täby, Sweden
- Posts
- 7,578
After closer examination, I guess you're referring to dual-booting using the windows boot loader, is that right? If so, why ever would you want to do that instead of using GRUB? GRUB is better in every possible way.
- 02-11-2003 #7Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Swansea (UK)
- Posts
- 221
yes i am using grub now, its good.... but how do i configurate it ?
- 02-12-2003 #8Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Täby, Sweden
- Posts
- 7,578
Well, I can't really go through everything about configuring grub here. But don't worry, if you run "info grub" you'll get all the info you'll ever need.


Reply With Quote
