Results 1 to 3 of 3
My grandfather and I were having a discussion about Linux, the fact that it is open-source, etc ... Then we got into the discussion that his Macintosh is Linux-based, but ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 01-01-2004 #1
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
Apple OS X License?
Then we got into the discussion that his Macintosh is Linux-based, but that it doesn't appear that the same licensing applies.
If Apple used a Linux based kernel, how are they able to bypass the licensing issues, and not allow their code to be distributed?
- 01-01-2004 #2
They wouldn't... Linux is released under GPL, which prohibits use of free software in un-free software (exept LGPL, that eg. GTK+ is released under, so if Apple used GTK+ to build something, they wouldt be needed to release that application under the GPL, but under a proprietary license if they wanted to), but *BSD is released under the BSD-license that allows it. That's why Apple can build off open-source and use it in their proprietary software... Just hope I got everything correct
You can look here for more information about licenses etc:
BTW; OS X + is based off BSD
- 01-01-2004 #3
- Join Date
- Nov 2002
The open source community done all the hard work... Apple cashed in