Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 4 of 4
ey guys, in essence, is building a binary from source RPM the same as compiling from source code - configure, make, make install - .. . ? or is there ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
  1. #1
    Linux User
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    289

    compile and/or SRPM


    ey guys, in essence, is building a binary from source RPM the same as compiling from source code - configure, make, make install - .. . ? or is there really a big difference?
    Registered User #345074

  2. #2
    Linux Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Täby, Sweden
    Posts
    7,578
    It's more or less the same, yeah.

  3. #3
    Linux Engineer
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    766
    it is is u run rpm -Uvh filename.src..rpm

    however if u run rpm --rebuild filename.src.rpm
    it will compile itself and put a normal rpm file (except it will be set up specifically for your system) in /usr/src/rpm

    this means u can still have all the rpm benefits (eg. listign files by package, version numbers etc)

  4. $spacer_open
    $spacer_close
  5. #4
    Linux User
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    289
    ok thanks guys! i'll stick with src.rpm then if that's the case. like Hellmasker said, i get to compile (--rebuild) it and still have the benefits of an rpm install. then i don't have to manually look for the files one by one in case i have to uninstall it. i think there's make uninstall but i usually delete the source folder and all it's make files after install coz it's a waste of space so make uninstall would be deemed useless.. .
    Registered User #345074

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •