Results 1 to 5 of 5
Has any one any idea how can we reduce the size of standard libc, as it has to be used on system with very less memory...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 02-17-2007 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 9
reducing libc size
Has any one any idea how can we reduce the size of standard libc, as it has to be used on system with very less memory
- 02-17-2007 #2
Have you tried µClibc?
Put your hand in an oven for a minute and it will be like an hour, sit beside a beautiful woman for an hour and it will be like a minute, that is relativity. --Albert Einstein
Linux User #425940
Don't PM me with questions, instead post in the forums
- 02-18-2007 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 9
Thankx Juan,
Unfortunately I'm already using uclibc, I need to further reduce the size
- 02-18-2007 #4Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- The Hot Humid South
- Posts
- 602
How about dietlibc? If I remember correctly it's smaller than uClibc. Any reason why you want something smaller than uClibc? I honestly don't think you can get smaller without loosing major functionality.
"Today you are freer than ever to do what you want, provided you can pay for it!" --Bad Religion
- 02-19-2007 #5Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 9
Thankx bidi,
Actually, I have to fit (application code + kernel ) in 4MB flash from 8MB, so on analysis of root filesytem I found uclibc is taking too much of space in filesystem, so am looking for some other version of uclibc with smaller size.
Originally Posted by bidi


Reply With Quote
