Results 1 to 5 of 5
Has any one any idea how can we reduce the size of standard libc, as it has to be used on system with very less memory...
- 02-17-2007 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 9
reducing libc size
Has any one any idea how can we reduce the size of standard libc, as it has to be used on system with very less memory
- 02-17-2007 #2
Have you tried µClibc?
Put your hand in an oven for a minute and it will be like an hour, sit beside a beautiful woman for an hour and it will be like a minute, that is relativity. --Albert Einstein
Linux User #425940
Don't PM me with questions, instead post in the forums
- 02-18-2007 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 9
Thankx Juan,
Unfortunately I'm already using uclibc, I need to further reduce the size
- 02-18-2007 #4Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- The Hot Humid South
- Posts
- 602
How about dietlibc? If I remember correctly it's smaller than uClibc. Any reason why you want something smaller than uClibc? I honestly don't think you can get smaller without loosing major functionality.
"Today you are freer than ever to do what you want, provided you can pay for it!" --Bad Religion
- 02-19-2007 #5Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 9
Thankx bidi,
Actually, I have to fit (application code + kernel ) in 4MB flash from 8MB, so on analysis of root filesytem I found uclibc is taking too much of space in filesystem, so am looking for some other version of uclibc with smaller size.
Originally Posted by bidi


Reply With Quote