Results 1 to 7 of 7
Hi everyone...I'm losing my mind...
Here is the situation...I've been using RH since 5.1 and I know my way around...somewhat...I recently installed Fedora Core 2 on my machine and I ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 06-29-2004 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 23
Fedora RC2 Networking driving me MAD!
Hi everyone...I'm losing my mind...
Here is the situation...I've been using RH since 5.1 and I know my way around...somewhat...I recently installed Fedora Core 2 on my machine and I can't get the internal network to work correctly.
The Server is a generic hardware system P4, On Board NIC VIA...etc..
It's acting as a router...when it's acting at all. if Config and Route listed at the bottom of this post. When I first installed I had (2) 3C905TX cards in the server along with the On Board NIC
eth0 (onboard) Via chipset -- DHCP enabled Connected to Switch, which is connected to cable modem -- This works fine
eth1 (3C905TX) -- Internal LAN 192.168.1.1 connected to switch, connected to internal LAN
eth2 (3C905TX) -- Internal LAN 192.168.1.1 connected to switch, connected to internal LAN
The internal network is all on 192.168.1.x, the reference client is WinXP at 192.168.1.2
When I installed I noticed that I couldn't ping the internal network...nothing came back...
I switched one of the 3Com cards for a Kingston Card...and things worked until i rebooted...then they stopped working...
I took out all of the cards...deleted their configs...in the GUI tool and restored only the Kingston card and the onboard nic...didn't work...
I've tried every combination of card, that I can think of and ran mii-tool
eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD flow-control, link ok
eth2: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok
In the above case, only the Kingston card and the onboard are installed.
I can't figure this out...what am I missing? I turned IPV6 off.
/etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth0
DEVICE=eth0
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
HWADDR=00:0a:e6:e9:dc:b5
USERCTL=yes
PEERDNS=yes
TYPE=Ethernet
IPV6INIT=no
~
/etc/sysconfig/networking/devices/ifcfg-eth2
DEVICE=eth2
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=none
IPADDR=192.168.1.1
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
HWADDR=00:C0:F0:30:0E:A6
USERCTL=no
PEERDNS=no
TYPE=Ethernet
IPV6INIT=no
Any help would be appreciated.
ROUTE
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth2
68.231.208.0 * 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth2
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
default ip68-231-208-1. 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
IFCONFIG
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0A:E6:E9
C:B5
inet addr:68.231.208.189 Bcast:68.231.211.255 Mask:255.255.252.0
inet6 addr: fe80::20a:e6ff:fee9:dcb5/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:399087 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:380 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:24457190 (23.3 Mb) TX bytes:42876 (41.8 Kb)
Interrupt:5 Base address:0xd00
eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:C0:F0:30:0E:A6
inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::2c0:f0ff:fe30:ea6/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:259 errors:1 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:202 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:31535 (30.7 Kb) TX bytes:19159 (18.7 Kb)
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x4f80
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:1989 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1989 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:1876713 (1.7 Mb) TX bytes:1876713 (1.7 Mb)
- 06-30-2004 #2Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Täby, Sweden
- Posts
- 7,578
Re: Fedora RC2 Networking driving me MAD!
Did you really mean that? Have you assigned 192.168.1.1 to both eth1 and eth2? In that case, no wonder it didn't work. =)
Originally Posted by Cr0n_J0b
You can't have two NICs with the same IP address. What exactly are you trying to do, really?
- 06-30-2004 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 23
You were right, it should have read 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.66
- 07-01-2004 #4Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Täby, Sweden
- Posts
- 7,578
I don't really understand the situation. Why do you want two seperate nicks on the same subnet?
I also never really understood the actual problem: In your original post, you never mentioned eth1 except in those two lines I quoted previously, but you never seemed to mention that as a problem. Is that somehow part of the problem? Would you care to elaborate a bit on just what the initial problem is?
Sorry to ask so much - I just never really my hands around the situation.
- 07-01-2004 #5Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 23
So the idea is that I have at least 2 NICs in my system, one is attached to the Cable modem network and the other to my internal LAN...The issue is that the internal LAN is not accessable...I initially tried this with 2 internal LAN NICs and even 3 seperate Intenal NICs...
There should be no issue with having multiple Interfaces on the same network, as long as they all have different addresses...which they do...
My problem is that I can't ping my internal LAN with even two cards installed...
- 07-01-2004 #6Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- Täby, Sweden
- Posts
- 7,578
No, there should indeed not be any issues with having two NICs connected to the same subnet, I'm just curious as to why you'd actually want that. =)
Anyway - if you try to ping a computer on the internal network, what happens? Can you see any activity indicators blinking on either the NICs or the hub? Do you get some kind of error messages?
- 07-01-2004 #7Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 23
Well, I did a fresh install with 4 nics...and it seems to be working...why four you ask? Cause that's all I had laying around...there is something hosed with the way that FC2 is setting up the routing...I can't figure out why it's not working right...so I guess I'll just leave in all these nics, and hope for the best...


Reply With Quote
