Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Hi everyone. Thanks for looking at this. I am experimenting around. Basically, I have a windows 2003 serv virtual machine (vmware) inside Ubuntu 9.10. The Ubuntu machine has IFconfig: Code: ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
  1. 03-31-2010 #1
    sinusoid
    sinusoid is offline
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5

    a little iptables, bridge, and vm help

    Hi everyone. Thanks for looking at this.

    I am experimenting around.

    Basically, I have a windows 2003 serv virtual machine (vmware) inside Ubuntu 9.10.

    The Ubuntu machine has IFconfig:

    Code:
    sam@sam-laptop:~$ ifconfig
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:15:c5:b8:c8:8b  
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
          Interrupt:17 

eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:16:cf:80:e1:73  
          inet addr:192.168.1.7  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::216:cfff:fe80:e173(slash)64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:76734 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:4709
          TX packets:68133 errors:8 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
          RX bytes:57927053 (57.9 MB)  TX bytes:13361129 (13.3 MB)
          Interrupt:16 Base address:0xc000 

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback  
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          inet6 addr: ::1(slash)128 Scope:Host
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:164 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:164 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
          RX bytes:12988 (12.9 KB)  TX bytes:12988 (12.9 KB)

vmnet1    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:50:56:c0:00:01  
          inet addr:172.16.242.1  Bcast:172.16.242.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::250:56ff:fec0:1(slash)64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:368 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)

vmnet8    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:50:56:c0:00:08  
          inet addr:172.16.206.1  Bcast:172.16.206.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::250:56ff:fec0:8(slash)64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:137 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:397 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)

    Iptables is

    Code:
    Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination         

Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination         
           all  --  anywhere             10.1.10.0 (slash 25)

Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination
    Code:
    Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
172.16.242.0    0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 vmnet1
192.168.1.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     2      0        0 eth1
10.1.10.0       0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 vmnet8
172.16.206.0    0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 vmnet8
169.254.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U     1000   0        0 eth1
0.0.0.0         192.168.1.1     0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth1
    Also ran a "sudo iptables -t nat -L"

    Code:
     
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination         

Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination         

Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination

    And here is some of the tcpdump, so I am assuming my packets/routes are correct from the wireless router:

    Code:
    17:14:51.873292 IP Laurie.home > 10.1.10.1: ICMP echo request, id 768, seq 33811, length 40
17:14:52.384680 IP 169.254.1.175.37679 > 169.254.1.255.5000: UDP, length 12
17:14:52.384949 IP Laurie.home > 172.16.206.128: ICMP echo request, id 768, seq 34067, length 40
17:14:52.804170 IP sam-laptop.home.mdns > 224.0.0.251.mdns: 0 PTR (QM)? 255.255.255.255.in-addr.arpa. (46)
17:14:52.860359 IP sam-laptop.home.59642 > iad04s01-in-f147.1e100.net.www: Flags [F.], seq 1, ack 1, win 108, options [nop,nop,TS val 1512845 ecr 2621050801], length 0
17:14:52.860430 IP sam-laptop.home.39915 > iad04s01-in-f104.1e100.net.www: Flags [F.], seq 1, ack 1, win 558, options [nop,nop,TS val 1512845 ecr 2621054269], length 0

    The internal 2003 serv (I know, i know) has ips of 172.16.206.128 and 10.1.10.1 on the 255.255.255.0 subs.

    I am curious ---- why can't I ping or simply access the internal server on my ubuntu machine from a another computer on the 192.168.1.0(slash)25 physcial network?

    Do I need a bridge? Iptables? Can they both do the same thing?

    thanks for your expertise guys.

    THANKS!!!!!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 03-31-2010 #2
    sinusoid
    sinusoid is offline
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5
    removed and condensed first message
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 04-01-2010 #3
    STanner
    STanner is offline
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Grand Rapids, MI
    Posts
    15
    I'm running redhat and xen, so I may not be of any help. But who knows, maybe we'll stumble on something.

    First, Can you ping the windows VM's from Ubuntu?

    Next, if you change the IP on the windows vm to a 192.168.1 address, are you able to ping it from the other hosts on the subnet?

    Lastly, do you want your Ubuntu hosts to act as a router between these subnets, or is there a router / VLAN switch handling this? If the Ubuntu host is acting as a router, are the other hosts configured to use it as a gateway?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 04-01-2010 #4
    coopstah13
    coopstah13 is offline
    Linux Guru coopstah13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    NH, USA
    Posts
    3,149
    you shouldn't have to do anything new, just make sure when you create the VM you give it a bridged NIC connection from each of the 2 networks, then make sure you configure the right IP on the right device inside of the guest

    are you able to access anything on the physical network from the guest?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 04-01-2010 #5
    HROAdmin26
    HROAdmin26 is offline
    Linux Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,722
    A) I see your active NIC in Ubuntu is eth1 - is this a wireless NIC? VMware does not support "bridged" mode for virtual NIC's if the physical NIC is wireless.

    B) That leaves you with attaching the Windows VM to the NAT (172.16.206.1/24) or host-only (172.16.242.1/24) network. Of course, these are different networks than your LAN (192.) and will not be accessible unless a route is specified to the machine trying to reach the Windows VM.

    The VMware docs cover networking.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules