Results 1 to 10 of 11
Hi all!
I have been having some trouble with my home network and maybe someone could help me out!
Here is my situation. First of all I have two Gentoo ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 04-04-2010 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 8
Trying to get 1000Mb/s speeds
Hi all!
I have been having some trouble with my home network and maybe someone could help me out!
Here is my situation. First of all I have two Gentoo Linux computers. These computer both have Ethernet ports that support 1000MB/s speeds. Here is the ethtool report for both of the cards.
Computer 1:
Code:Settings for eth1: Supported ports: [ MII ] Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Full Supports auto-negotiation: Yes Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Full Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes Speed: 1000Mb/s Duplex: Full Port: MII PHYAD: 1 Transceiver: external Auto-negotiation: on Supports Wake-on: g Wake-on: d Link detected: yes
Computer 2:
Code:Settings for eth1: Supported ports: [ TP MII ] Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full Supports auto-negotiation: Yes Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes Speed: 1000Mb/s Duplex: Full Port: MII PHYAD: 0 Transceiver: internal Auto-negotiation: on Supports Wake-on: pumbg Wake-on: g Current message level: 0x00000033 (51) Link detected: yes
I have a Cat6 cable connecting the two computers together for direct file backup. Now when I run iperf to check my speeds, I get the following:
My question is why is this so slow and how do I get my speeds closer to 1000Mb/s?Code:------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 192.168.1.2, TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 16.0 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 3] local 192.168.1.1 port 51659 connected with 192.168.1.2 port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 76.5 MBytes 64.2 Mbits/sec
Any help is very much appreciated!
- 04-04-2010 #2
You directly connected them, so there is no switch involved?
With the switch out of the way, are the PCs fast enough to handel GBit wirespeed?
But most likely: What kind of NICs do you have?
For example: Some cheap realtek wont do it, imho.You must always face the curtain with a bow.
- 04-04-2010 #3Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 8
Yes that is correct!
I probably should have mentioned that...
They are connected directly together using a Cat6 crossover cable.
No switch or hub used....
- 04-04-2010 #4
ok, but how fast are your PCs and
most of all: what brand are your network cards?You must always face the curtain with a bow.
- 04-04-2010 #5Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Posts
- 54
What is the filesize you are using? What are your CPU and memory loads on the individual machines while the transfer is happening? Is it swapping while trying to read/write before/after transfer? If so, you are now getting into disk access issues as well, and so your speed measurement would not be truly representative.
- 04-04-2010 #6Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 8
Computer 1:
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+
ASUS M2N-SLI Deluxe AM2 NVIDIA nForce
6G of ram
On-board motherboard networking.
I'm no sure what the type it is....
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer 2 (the old computer):
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2000+
256M of ram
Rosewill RC-400 10/ 100/ 1000Mbps Networking LAN Card
Sorry I can't post links yet on the forum...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When running both of the test, both PC's were experience little to no cpu/memory/swap usage.
By test I mean running iperf.
- 04-04-2010 #7Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 8
when I do a lspci for the on-board network it comes up as this... if that helps at all???
00:08.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP55 Ethernet (rev a2)
00:09.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP55 Ethernet (rev a2)
- 04-04-2010 #8Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 8
Oh this may be part of my problem...
I decided to do a scp of a movie file I had and then looked at the performance of both my machines.
First he is the scp output:
Move_Name.mkv 41% 3586MB 15.4 MB/s 4:00 ETA
Here might be the problem:
The older pc (Computer 2)
Stats during transfer:
CPU 100%
The memory usage ans swap are still both very low but this hi cpu usage might be the problem....
What do you guys think???
- 04-04-2010 #9
Cant say anything about the Rosewill, as I dont know them.
But the nvidias dont have a good reputation in my book.
Can you get a pair of intel GBit Pro/1000 GT, even just for a comparison?
Most probably the throughput will be close to wirespeed with them.
Also, the older PC might have a hard time to keep up.
You might get wirespeed with a pure throughput test, but for scp the CPU has to work hard.Last edited by Irithori; 04-04-2010 at 09:53 PM.
You must always face the curtain with a bow.
- 04-04-2010 #10Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Posts
- 54
Yes, the smaller PC is not able to handle the load CPU wise.


Reply With Quote
